Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Forgery and the End of the ‘Bloody Code’ in Early Nineteenth-Century England

Bibliographic Data

ID8959148
AuthorsPhil Handler (University of Leicester, corresponding author)
Year2005
Volume48
Issue3
Pages683-702
Publication date2005-09-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueThe Historical Journal (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0018-246X • E-ISSN: 1469-5103
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/s0018246x05004620
OpenAlexW2132524833
LanguageEN
Citations received10

Penal reformers in the 1810s and 1820s condemned the English criminal law as a ‘bloody code’: a monolithic mass of draconian statutes inherited from a former, less civilized age. This overwhelmingly negative image underpinned the dramatic and unexpected repeal of the capital statutes in the 1830s and survived to define a whole era of criminal justice history. This article explores the conditions that enabled the reformers to establish such a powerful critique of the law in such a short space of time. It contends that a key to their success was their ability to exploit contemporary scandals to argue that the law had lost touch with public opinion. Forgery aroused more controversy than any other species of capital crime in the 1820s and became the focal point for opposition to the capital laws. By analysing how reformers used the scandal surrounding forgery to foster the notion that the law was a ‘bloody code’, this article presents a new perspective on the early nineteenth-century penal reform debate

Capital (architecture · Criminal Code · Criminal justice · Criminal law · Opposition (politics · Political science · Politics · Repeal · Statute · Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis · Historical and Scientific Studies · Historical Economic and Social Studies · History · Law

  • Criminal Intent in Nineteenth-Century England

    Open Access•Philip Handler•The Cambridge Law Journal•2024

  • British Labour History Publications 2006

    Yasmin Adeeb, Fathi Boud•Labour History Review•2007

  • Disciplining the Market

    Open Access•Erika Vause•Law and History Review•2014

  • Russian Capitalism on Trial

    Open Access•Sergei Antonov•Law and History Review•2017

  • Managing the Gallows

    Open Access•Randall Mcgowen•Law and History Review•2007

  • Privacy, Publicity, and Reputation

    Open Access•James Taylor•The Business History Review•2013

  • The Duplicity of Paper

    Open Access•Bhavani Raman•Comparative Studies in Society…•2012

  • James Mackintosh and Early Nineteenth-Century Criminal Law

    Open Access•Philip Handler•The Historical Journal•2015

  • White-collar crime and the law in nineteenth-century Britain

    James Taylor•Business History•2018

  • Archaic Sovereignty and Colonial Law

    Open Access•Anna Mcclure, Alastair Mcclure•Modern Asian Studies•2020

Unique citing works10
Citations per year0,53
Citation span2007 - 2024 (18)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 10

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae