At the Nation-State’s Edge
Centre–periphery Relations in Post-1947 South Asia
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 8959236 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Elisabeth Leake (0000-0003-1277-580X, Royal Holloway University of London, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2016 |
| Volume | 59 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 509-539 |
| Publication date | 2016-02-26 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The Historical Journal (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0018-246X • E-ISSN: 1469-5103 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0018246x15000394 |
| OpenAlex | W2346246417 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 4 |
| References cited | 7 |
This article examines centre–periphery relations in post-colonial India and Pakistan, providing a specific comparative history of autonomy movements in Nagaland (1947–63) and Baluchistan (1973–7). It highlights the key role played by the central government – particularly by Jawaharlal Nehru and Zulfikar Ali Bhutto – in quelling both insurgencies and in taking further steps to integrate these regions. It argues that a shared colonial history of political autonomy shaped local actors’ resistance to integration into the independent nation-states of India and Pakistan. This article also reveals that Indian and Pakistani officials used their shared colonial past in very different ways to mould their borderlands policies. India's central government under Nehru agreed to a modified Naga State within the Indian Union that allowed the Nagas a large degree of autonomy, continuing a colonial method of semi-integration. In contrast, Bhutto's government actively sought to abandon long-standing Baluch political and social structures to reaffirm the sovereignty of the Pakistani state. The article explains this divergence in terms of the different governing exigencies facing each country at the time of the insurgencies. It ultimately calls for an expansion in local histories and subnational comparisons to extend understanding of post-1947 South Asia, and the decolonizing world more broadly
Autonomy · Central government · Colonialism · Development economics · Economic history · Economics · Geography · Government (linguistics · Local government · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Sovereignty · State (computer science · History · Law · Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East · Public Administration · South Asian Studies and Conflicts · Southeast Asian Sociopolitical Studies
Natural Frontiers Revisited
Nation-building or state-making? India's North-East Frontier and the ambiguities of Nehruvian developmentalism, 1950–1959
Knights, Not Pawns
Imagining India, Decolonizing l'Inde Française , C. 1947–1954
Renewed Ethnonationalist Insurgency in Balochistan, Pakistan
The Colonial State and Constructions of Indian Identity
| Unique citing works | 4 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,44 |
| Citation span | 2017 - 2024 (8) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 4 |