Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Great Britain, the United States, and Consultation Over Use of the Atomic Bomb, 1950–1954

Datos Bibliográficos

ID8959243
AutoresMatthew Jones (0000-0002-9272-5687, University of Nottingham, autor de correspondencia)
Año2011
Volumen54
Número3
Páginas797-828
Fecha de publicación2011-07-29
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaThe Historical Journal (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0018-246X • E-ISSN: 1469-5103
EditorialCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/s0018246x11000240
OpenAlexW1976308006
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas5
Referencias citadas36

The subject of when nuclear weapons might have to be employed by the United States during the early Cold War period was the setting for a prolonged and uneasy dialogue within the Anglo-American relationship. While British governments pressed for a formal agreement that there should be prior consultation before the atomic bomb was ever used, the Americans were determined to retain the freedom to take this crucial decision alone. This article explores the debates that ensued and the tensions that were created by this issue, between the meetings of Attlee and Truman in December 1950 and the Indochina crisis of 1954, and highlights the contrasting geopolitical positions of Britain and the United States as they sought to reconcile their views. For the British, playing host to a clutch of important US airbases, the risk of early nuclear devastation in any outbreak of general war was a paramount consideration. Although impatient with British caution, the Americans recognized an overriding need for allied support in general war giving British views the capacity to exercise a restraining influence

Cold war · Economic history · Geopolitics · History of the United States · Nuclear weapon · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Subject (documents · Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis · History · Law · Vietnamese History and Culture Studies

  • Balance of Power Redux

    Open Access•Eliza Gheorghe•The Chinese Journal of…•2022

  • A very different kind of challenge’? Nato’s prioritization of China in historical perspective

    Open Access•Jeffrey Michaels•International Politics•2021

  • End of Empire and the Bomb

    Open Access•Matthew Jones•The Journal of Imperial &…•2022

  • No annihilation without representation”

    Jeffrey H Michaels, Jeffrey Michaels•Journal of Strategic Studies•2023

  • Introduction

    Open Access•JONATHAN HOGG, Christoph Laucht•The British Journal for the…•2012

  • Nuclear blackmail and nuclear balance

    Richard K Betts•Nuclear blackmail and nuclear…•1987

  • The U.S. Government and the Vietnam War: Executive and Legislative Roles and Relationships, Part I

    William Conrad Gibbons•U. S. Government and the Vietnam…•1986

  • History and Strategy

    Marc Trachtenberg•History and Strategy•1991

  • Waging Peace

    Robert R Bowie, Richard H Immerman•Waging peace•1998

  • Ernest Bevin

    Alan Bullock•Ernest Bevin•2002

  • After Hiroshima

    Open Access•Matthew Jones•After Hiroshima•2010

  • The U.S. Government and the Vietnam War

    William Conrad Gibbons•U. S. Government and the Vietnam…•1986

  • The Geneva Conference of 1954 on Indochina

    Open Access•James Cable•Geneva Conference of 1954 on…•1986

  • The Korean War and American Politics

    Ronald J Caridi•Korean War and American Politics•1968

  • The Korean War

    William Stueck•Korean War•1997

  • A Most Special Relationship

    Ken Young•Journal of Cold War Studies•2007

  • The Missiles of November, December, January, February

    David Coleman•Journal of Cold War Studies•2007

  • Containing America’

    Kevin Ruane•Diplomacy and Statecraft•1996

  • US ‘Atomic Capability’ and the British Forward Bases in the Early Cold War

    Open Access•Ken Young•Journal of Contemporary History•2006

  • The Long Wait

    Donald W White, Timothy J Botti•Journal of American History•1989

  • European Economic Integration and Asia's Trade

    Open Access•Subimal Mookerjee•International Studies•1959

  • Setting the mould

    Keith Robbins•International Affairs•1987

  • Oliver Franks

    Michael F Hopkins•International Affairs•1993

  • The Korean war

    Stephen Prince, Stephen L Prince•International Affairs•1996

  • The struggle for nuclear partnership

    Ian Gambles•International Affairs•1993

  • Containment

    Gaddis Smith, Thomas H Etzold et al.•Foreign Affairs•1978

  • The Fringes of Power

    Fritz Stern, John Colville•Foreign Affairs•1986

  • Refusing to Pay the Price

    Kevin Ruane•The English Historical Review•1995

  • Anthony Eden, British diplomacy and the origins of the Geneva Conference of 1954

    Open Access•Kevin Ruane•The Historical Journal•1994

  • Military nuclear relations between the United States and Great Britain under the terms of the McMahon Act, 1946–1958

    Open Access•Simon Ball, S J Ball•The Historical Journal•1995

  • Selling the Korean War propaganda, politics, and public opinion in the United States, 1950 - 1953

    Steven Casey•Selling the Korean War•2008

Obras citantes distintas5
Citas por año0,36
Intervalo de citas2012 - 2023 (12)
Velocidad de citaciónhistorical
Altamente citadoNo
Tipos de citaNeutras: 5
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae