Greek Nonsense in More’s Utopia
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 8959515 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Eric Nelson (0000-0002-4084-8570, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2001 |
| Volume | 44 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 889-917 |
| Publication date | 2001-12-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The Historical Journal (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0018-246X • E-ISSN: 1469-5103 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0018246x01002096 |
| OpenAlex | W2148984135 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 6 |
This article locates Sir Thomas More’s Utopia within the broader context of the sixteenth-century Greek revival in England. More and the other humanists whom Erasmus befriended during his time in England became the first Englishmen to learn Greek and to make a polemical point of preferring Greece to Rome. During the period of Utopia’ s preparation and publication, this circle’s Hellenism took on a new intensity, as several of its members were called upon to defend Erasmus’s controversial project of using the Greek New Testament to correct the Vulgate. Responding to opponents of the new Greek learning, the Erasmians launched a particularly energetic attack on Roman philosophy. It is argued that Utopia intervenes in this quarrel by dramatizing a confrontation between the values of the Roman republican tradition and those of a rival commonwealth theory based on Greek ethics. Utopia suggests that, when seen from a Roman perspective, Greek advice looks like ‘nonsense’. But, for More, that ‘nonsense’ yields the ‘best state of a commonwealth’
Archaeology · Art · Art history · Commonwealth · Context (archaeology · Eleventh · Erasmus · Humanism · Literature · Nonsense · Political science · Theology · Utopia · American Constitutional Law and Politics · Classical Antiquity Studies · Classics · History · Law · Philosophy · Religion and Society Interactions
| Citations per year | 0.27 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2004 - 2022 (19) |
| Highly cited | No |