Islands as Laboratories

Indigenous Knowledge and Gene Drives in the Pacific

Bibliographic Data

ID8960640
AuthorsRiley Taitingfong (0000-0003-0981-4783, University of California San Diego, corresponding author), Taitingfong Taitingfong
Year2019
Volume91
Issue3
Pages179-179
Publication date2019-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueHuman Biology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0018-7143 • E-ISSN: 1534-6617
PublisherProject MUSE (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.13110/humanbiology.91.3.01
PMID32549032
OpenAlexW3007690976
LanguageEN
Citations received17
References cited8

This article argues that the genetic engineering technology known as gene drive must be evaluated in the context of the historic and ongoing impacts of settler colonialism and military experimentation on indigenous lands and peoples. After defining gene drive and previewing some of the key ethical issues related to its use, the author compares the language used to justify Cold War-era nuclear testing in the Pacific with contemporary scholarship framing islands as ideal test sites for gene drive-modified organisms. In both cases, perceptions of islands as remote and isolated are mobilized to warrant their treatment as sites of experimentation for emerging technologies. Though gene drive may offer valuable interventions into issues affecting island communities (e.g., vector-borne disease and invasive species management), proposals to conduct the first open trials of gene drive on islands are complicit in a long history of injustice that has treated islands (and their residents) as dispensable to the risks and unintended consequences associated with experimentation. This article contends that ethical gene drive research cannot be achieved without the inclusion of indigenous peoples as key stakeholders and provides three recommendations to guide community engagement involving indigenous communities: centering indigenous self-determination, replacing the deficit model of engagement with a truly participatory model, and integrating indigenous knowledge and values in the research and decision-making processes related to gene drive

Biology · Business · Citizen journalism · Community engagement · Environmental ethics · Framing (construction · Gene drive · Geography · Indigenous · Participatory action research · Political science · Public relations · Scholarship · Sociology · Warrant · Anthropology · CRISPR and Genetic Engineering · Ecology · Genetically Modified Organisms Research · Genetics · Law · Socioeconomics of Resources and Conservation

Tools

Open DOI