Is there overestimation of 'British capital' outflow? Keynes' Indo-British trade and transfer accounts re-examined with alternative evidence

Bibliographic Data

ID8961132
AuthorsDebdas Banerjee (0000-0001-5518-7114, Institute of Development Studies Kolkata, corresponding author)
Year2004
Volume41
Issue2
Pages143-164
Publication date2004-04-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueThe Indian Economic & Social History Review (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0019-4646 • E-ISSN: 0973-0893
PublisherSAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/001946460404100202
OpenAlexW2018500808
LanguageEN
Citations received4

An excessive export of capitalfrom Britain during 1870-1914 allegedly reduced the domestic rate of investment. Few studies have really tried to find out how much of the nominal sum in each case was taken up by British investors, and how much of that, in turn, actually found its way abroad. The profits that accrued from trade in colonial products are either ignored altogether or grossly underestimated in the usual accounts of 'benefits of imperialism'. Drawing on Indo-British official trade statistics as well as on private papers, this article re- examines Keynes'estimate of 'drain' from England into India based on the sales of Council Bills. The conclusions of this study are: (a) the profits on Indo-British commodity value chains were much higher than they were assumed to be; and (b) a very large part of the 'British'capital outflom to colonies was in fact recycled profits made on colonial trade

Capital (architecture · Colonialism · Commodity · Economics · Economy · Foreign direct investment · Geography · International economics · Investment (military · Macroeconomics · Market economy · Monetary economics · Political science · Value (mathematics · Australian History and Society · Global Financial Crisis and Policies · Law

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub