Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Labour electoral landslides and the changing efficiency of voting distributions

Bibliographic Data

ID8962269
AuthorsRon Johnston (0000-0003-3031-8573, University of Bristol, corresponding author), David Rossiter (University of Leeds), Charles Pattie (0000-0003-4578-178X, University of Sheffield), Danny Dorling (0000-0001-9519-0537, University of Leeds)
Year2002
Volume27
Issue3
Pages336-361
Publication date2002-09-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueTransactions of the Institute of British Geographers (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0020-2754 • E-ISSN: 1475-5661
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/1475-5661.00058
OpenAlexW2131652753
LanguageEN
Citations received14
References cited10

The translation of votes into seats under first–past–the–post electoral systems with single–member constituencies invariably results in disproportional allocations of seats relative to votes among the main two parties. It also tends to produce biased outcomes, with one party getting a more disproportionate share of the seats with a given share of the votes than does its opponent. In Great Britain, these biases favoured the Conservative party until the 1980s, but now strongly favour Labour. Production of those biases results from a variety of influences involving the interaction of the geography of party support with that of constituency boundaries. Increasingly, that interaction has favoured Labour: without any explicit manipulation of the constituency map to its own ends, it now benefits substantially from the equivalent of the malapportionment and gerrymandering cartographic abuses typical of the United States, because of its ability to manipulate its vote distribution within the constituency system

Adversary · Business · Computer security · Democracy · Distribution (mathematics · Economics · Electoral geography · Gerrymandering · Microeconomics · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Production (economics · Variety (cybernetics · Voting · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Law · Political and Economic history of UK and US · Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies

  • Disproportionality and Bias in the Results of the 2005 General Election in Great Britain

    Ron Johnston, David Rossiter et al.•Journal of Elections Public…•2006

  • Electoral Costs and Local Public Institutions’ Role in Voter Turnout

    Open Access•Martin Král•International Journal of Public…•2026

  • Magnifying Voters' Preferences

    Michael Thrasher, Ron Johnston et al.•The Journal of Interdisciplinary…•2004

  • Redistricting Local Governments in England

    Open Access•Colin Rallings, Michael Thrasher et al.•State Politics & Policy Quarterly•2004

  • National identity and regional development

    Joanie Willett•National Identities•2013

  • Political geography

    Open Access•Courtney Flint•Progress in Human Geography•2003

  • Bonuses and penalties in vote to seat conversion under single-member plurality electoral rules in a cross-national perspective

    Open Access•Grigorii V Golosov•Acta Politica•2026

  • City–suburban electoral polarization in Great Britain, 1950–2001

    Open Access•R Alan Walks•Transactions of the Institute of…•2005

  • Unequal and Unequally Distributed Votes

    Open Access•Ron Johnston, Galina Borisyuk et al.•Political Studies•2012

  • Electoral Disproportionality and Bias Under the Alternative Vote

    Ron Johnston, James Forrest•Australian Journal of Political…•2009

  • Disproportionality and bias in US Presidential Elections

    Open Access•Ron Johnston, David Rossiter et al.•Political Geography•2005

  • Electoral geography

    Open Access•Benjamin Forest•Geography Compass•2018

  • Measuring bias

    Open Access•Galina Borisyuk, Ron Johnston et al.•Electoral Studies•2008

  • All connected? Geographies of race, death, wealth, votes and births

    Open Access•Danny Dorling•Geographical Journal•2010

  • Seats, Votes, and the Spatial Organization of Elections

    Graham Gudgin•Seats, Votes, and the Spatial…•1980

  • The political consequences of electoral laws

    Douglas W Rae•The political consequences of…•1971

  • Electoral Distortion in New Zealand

    Open Access•R H Brookes•Australian Journal of Politics &…•1959

  • Spatial Structure, Plurality Systems, and Electoral Bias

    Open Access•Ron Johnston, R J Johnston•Canadian Geographies /…•1976

  • Ideal and Reality in Reapportionment

    Richard L Morrill•Annals of the Association of…•1973

  • Tactical Voting in Great Britain in 1983 and 1987

    Open Access•Ron Johnston, R J Johnston et al.•British Journal of Political…•1991

  • Integrating and decomposing the sources of partisan bias

    Open Access•Ron Johnston, David Rossiter et al.•Electoral Studies•1999

  • Winning the Local Vote

    Open Access•Charles Pattie, Charles J Pattie et al.•American Political Science Review•1995

Unique citing works14
Citations per year0,61
Citation span2003 - 2026 (24)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 14

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae