Urban political ecologies of heritage

Integrating cultural and natural landscapes in Penang, Malaysia

Bibliographic Data

ID8963706
AuthorsCreighton Connolly (0000-0002-4782-2621, School of Geography University of Lincoln Lincoln UK, corresponding author)
Year2019
Volume45
Issue1
Pages168-180
Publication date2019-08-12
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueTransactions of the Institute of British Geographers (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0020-2754 • E-ISSN: 1475-5661
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/tran.12335
OpenAlexW2967952438
LanguageEN
Citations received9
References cited58

Over the past few decades, there have been numerous studies examining the interface between cultural heritage conservation and urban (re)development, particularly in rapidly developing regions. On the other hand, scholars have also examined nature conservation movements in the context of encroaching (urban) development. However, this body of research has, with a few exceptions, not considered the interrelationship between natural and cultural heritage in urban settings. The paper argues that a renewed understanding of urban heritage – consisting of both cultural and natural elements – is required for effective and socio‐ecologically sustainable approaches to heritage conservation and urban development. To illustrate this argument, the paper draws on an empirical examination of Penang Hill, which is a culturally and ecologically significant area of Penang Island, Malaysia. In conceptualising this relationship, the paper draws on the urban political ecologies of landscape, which is useful in examining the urbanisation of nature and problematising distinctions between urban/rural and natural/cultural. As I will demonstrate, invocations of Penang's rich natural heritage are often framed alongside urban and cultural heritage in local resistance to these developments, which relate to the particular socio‐environmental sensibilities of local stakeholders. The analysis is based on discursive analysis of primary written sources and original interviews with local residents and civil society activists, which helps to demonstrate the crucial role of local communities in achieving more socio‐ecologically just forms of heritage management

Archaeology · Argument (complex analysis · Context (archaeology · Cultural heritage · Cultural heritage management · Economic growth · Environmental ethics · Environmental planning · Geography · Natural (archaeology · Natural heritage · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Tourism · Urbanization · Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation · Law · Southeast Asian Sociopolitical Studies · Water Governance and Infrastructure

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access