The Bakhtiyārī Ilkhānī

The very use of the term “Bakhtiyārī” with its implicit notion of sociopolitical unity has obscured the nature of the organization and relationships of these pastoral nomadic tribes. 1 At the same time that observers of late nineteenth- and early twentieth-century Iran described the Bakhtiyārī as a unit, they could not explain the prevailing disunity that characterized tribal relationships. Major obstacles for analysis of this problem have been the office of the īlkhānī , paramount chief of all the Bakhtiyārī, and the domination of tribal history by the family of those eligible for this position, which has imposed a certain unity upon recent Bakhtiyārī history. The view that an īlkhānī had long ruled the Bakhtiyārī and that the tribes constituted a confederation has been accepted since the late nineteenth century. Yet the first īlkhānī, Husain Qulī Khan, was not appointed until 1867, and possibly only during his. tenure in office (d. 1882), and again during the Persian Revolution, have the Bakhtiyārī functioned as a true confederation. The significance of prevailing disunity under a temporary political and administrative unity goes beyond the history of the Bakhtiyārī and has important implications for an understanding of Iranian society and history itself

Ancient history · Economic history · Political science · Politics · History · Islamic Studies and History · Law · Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East

• The History Of The World Conqueror Vol II

  John Andrew Boyle•The History Of The World…•1958

  Add to list

• The Ba kh tiyâri Kh ans, The Government of Iran, and the British, 1846–1915

  Open Access•Gene R Garthwaite•International Journal Middle East…•1972

  Add to list

• Two Persian Wills of Ḥājj ʿAlī Qulī Khān Sardār Asʿad

  Gene R Garthwaite•Journal of the American Oriental…•1975

  Add to list

• The Structure of Parallel Cousin Marriage1

  Open Access•Robert F Murphy, Leonard Kasdan•American Anthropologist•1959

  Add to list