Lewis Carroll and psychoanalysis
Why nothing adds up in wonderland
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 8971375 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Christopher Lane (0000-0003-2945-9352, Pearce Miller Research Professor of Literature, Northwestern UniversityEvanston, IL 60208USA, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2011 |
| Volume | 92 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 1029-1045 |
| Publication date | 2011-03-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The International Journal of Psychoanalysis (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0020-7578 • E-ISSN: 1745-8315 |
| Publisher | Taylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1745-8315.2011.00404.x |
| PMID | 21843247 |
| OpenAlex | W1579439430 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 5 |
Each generation of psychoanalyst has found different things to value and sometimes to censure in Lewis Carroll's remarkable fiction and flights of fancy. But what does Carroll's almost 'surrealist' perspective in the Alice stories tell us about the rituals and symbols that govern life beyond Wonderland and Looking-Glass World? Arguing that Carroll's strong interest in meaning and nonsense in these and later works helps make the world strange to readers, the better to show it off-kilter, this essay focuses on Jacques Lacan's Carroll - the writer-logician who stressed, as Lacan did, the difficulty and price of adapting to the symbolic order. By reconsidering Lacan's 1966 homage to the eccentric Victorian, I argue that Carroll's insight into meaning and interpretation remains of key interest to psychoanalysts intent on hearing all that he had to say about psychic life
Art · Epistemology · Interpretation (philosophy · Linguistics · Meaning (existential · Nonsense · Nothing · Order (exchange · Perspective (graphical · Psychic · Psychoanalysis · Value (mathematics · Crime and Detective Fiction Studies · Gothic Literature and Media Analysis · Literature: history, themes, analysis · Philosophy · Psychology
| Citations per year | 0.1 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2016 - 2016 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |