Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The unreachable object? Difficulties and paradoxes in the analytical relationship with borderline patients

Bibliographic Data

ID8971966
AuthorsIrene Ruggiero (Via Dagnini 32, 40137, Bologna, Italia, corresponding author)
Year2012
Volume93
Issue3
Pages585-606
Publication date2012-04-12
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueThe International Journal of Psychoanalysis (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0020-7578 • E-ISSN: 1745-8315
PublisherTaylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/j.1745-8315.2011.00529.x
PMID22671251
OpenAlexW2160900088
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited4

The author investigates the main difficulties the analyst encounters in borderline patient analysis, focusing on the specific way in which such patients put the analyst's mental functioning to the test and highlighting the most salient elements of the transference-countertransference dynamic. The author picks out several of the paradoxes that characterize the analytical relationship with these patients, who are constantly seeking contact with the object, which is inevitably traumatic for them. On the basis of highly detailed clinical material, the author demonstrates how - no matter which theoretical-clinical model is adopted - a specific technical problem with these patients is how to manage their intense destructiveness. With these patients, countertransferential difficulties are inevitably predominant because of the looming threat of the destruction of the analytical relationship. Maintaining a balance between the recognition-legitimization of primary narcissistic mirroring needs and the recognition-control of narcissistic demands and attacks on the analytical link is as crucial as it is complex. The paper examines the most important therapeutic and anti-therapeutic factors, highlighting the importance of countertransference analysis and self-analysis as ways of accessing as yet unrepresented elements of the patient and analyst respectively. Particular attention is given to the role played by the analyst's subjectivity and to the enactment

Cognitive psychology · Countertransference · Epistemology · Mirroring · Object (grammar · Object relations theory · Psychoanalytic theory · Psychotherapist · Salient · Subjectivity · Therapeutic relationship · Transference · Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology · Artificial Intelligence · Computer Science · Psychological Testing and Assessment · Psychology · Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications · Social Psychology

  • Void and narrative in the clinic of addictions

    Open Access•Clément Cimolaï, Vincent Bréjard•Health An Interdisciplinary…•2024

  • Counter‐transference

    Open Access•Paula Heimann, Donald W Winnicott et al.•British Journal of Medical…•1960

  • The Meanings and Uses of Countertransference

    Open Access•Heinrich Racker•The Psychoanalytic Quarterly•2007

  • The reality of the other

    Open Access•Anna Ferruta•The International Journal of…•2009

  • Clinical and Theoretical Aspects of Enactment

    Open Access•James T Mclaughlin•Journal of the American…•1991

Unique citing works1
Citations per year0,5
Citation span2024 - 2024 (1)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 1

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae