The case against neuroplastic analysis
A further illustration of the irrelevance of neuroscience to psychoanalysis through a critique of Doidge's The Brain that Changes Itself
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 8973403 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Zvi Carmeli (The Department of Psychology, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel, 91905, corresponding author), Rachel Β Blass (Heythrop College, University of London, corresponding author), Rachel Blass (Heythrop College, The University of London, 23 Kensington Square, London, W8 5HN, UK) |
| Year | 2013 |
| Volume | 94 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 391-410 |
| Publication date | 2013-02-12 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The International Journal of Psychoanalysis (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0020-7578 • E-ISSN: 1745-8315 |
| Publisher | Taylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/1745-8315.12022 |
| OpenAlex | W2034158590 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 7 |
| References cited | 11 |
In a previous paper, we critically examined claims put forth by proponents of the growing neuropsychoanalytic trend (Blass and Carmeli, 2007). In particular, we called into question the claim that
Cognitive science · Neuroplasticity · Psychoanalysis · Mental Health and Psychiatry · Neurology and Historical Studies · Neuroscience · Psychology · Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Examining the function of neurobiology in Christian spiritual experiences and practice
Neuroscience and the “science” of psychoanalysis
What kind of discipline is psychoanalysis
Further evidence for the case against neuropsychoanalysis
Response to Kessler, Sandberg, and Busch
The case for neuropsychoanalysis
On the need of fundaments in psychoanalytic thinking
| Unique citing works | 7 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,64 |
| Citation span | 2015 - 2020 (6) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 7 |