The Romantic Realism of Michel Foucault The Scientific Temptation
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 8975008 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Charles R Varela (Department of Anthropology University of Illinois Champaign/Urbana USA, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2012 |
| Volume | 43 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 1-22 |
| Publication date | 2012-10-22 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0021-8308 • E-ISSN: 1468-5914 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/jtsb.12000 |
| OpenAlex | W1931381380 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 19 |
B eatrice H an has argued that the theories of subjection (determinism: structure) and subjectivation (freedom: agency) are the “the blind spot[s] of Foucault's work.” Furthermore, she continues, as historical and transcendental theories, respectively, Foucault left them in a state of irresolvable conflict. In the S cientific T emptation I have shown that, as a practicing researcher, F oucault encourages us to situate the theories of the subject in the context of his un‐thematized search for a metaphysics of realism, the purpose of which was to ground his complementary reach for a possibility of naturalism. In Returning to K ant I now argue that it is this fundamental feature of “ F oucault's F oucault” that drives his returns to K ant, the purpose of which was to resolve the conflicting theories of the subject and thereby solve his G iddensian problem of structure and creativity. Locating the returns and their purpose in the context of my own arguments for the recovery of human agency, I argue that F oucault's attempts to solve his G iddensian problem led to two unfortunate solutions. In the first return, his resort to B audelaire's aesthetic subject is a regression to a pre‐noumenal conception of the K antian subject. With the second return, the reinstatement of the K antian subject as causally empowered, minus the noumenalism, is nothing more than a reclamation of K ant's conception. I argue that only a reconstruction of F oucault's scientific realism permits us to understand that he could have moved beyond mere reclamation to the actual recovery of human agency
Agency (philosophy · Context (archaeology · Determinism · Epistemology · Metaphysics · Naturalism · Nothing · Object (grammar · Realism · Scientific realism · Sociology · Subject (documents · Temptation · Computer Science · Feminism, Gender, and Sexuality Studies · Foucault, Power, and Ethics · Philosophy · Philosophy and Social Theory
The passion of Michel Foucault
A Realist Philosophy of Social Science
Discipline and Punish
The Blackwell companion to social theory
The Birth of the Clinic
Michel Foucault. Social Theory and Transgression
The Cambridge Companion to Foucault
Michel Foucault
Capitalism and Modern Social Theory
The Cambridge Companion to Foucault
Michel Foucault
Michel Foucault's Archaeology of Scientific Reason
Michel Foucault
Michel Foucault, The History of Sexuality, and the Reformulation of Social Theory
Biological Structure and Embodied Human Agency
Madness and Civilization
Language, Counter-Memory, Practice
| Highly cited | No |
|---|