Self‐Consciousness in Shame

The Role of the ‘Other’

Bibliographic Data

ID8975476
AuthorsRay W Crozier (University of Wales, corresponding author)
Year1998
Volume28
Issue3
Pages273-286
Publication date1998-12-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal for the Theory of Social Behaviour (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0021-8308 • E-ISSN: 1468-5914
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/1468-5914.00075
OpenAlexW1985557947
LanguageEN
Citations received21

Although several philosophical approaches to shame emphasize the role of the ‘other’ this has attracted less attention from psychologists. The psychological construct of self‐awareness does not adequately account for the shift in perspective that is involved in shame or embarrassment. This paper outlines a framework for the analysis of shame which emphasises the adoption of another perspective on the self. It proposes that shame is experienced when an individual recognises that an action can give rise to a negative interpretation by others of core aspects of the self, even if he or she does not share that interpretation and there is no self‐attribution of responsibility for any wrongdoing. The framework is applied to the analysis of two episodes from Elizabeth Gaskell’s novel, North and South . The character is described as experiencing intense shame, despite her belief that she has behaved properly, and this is accompanied by her preoccupation with how her behaviour can be interpreted by others

Action (physics · Attribution · Consciousness · Construct (python library · Embarrassment · Epistemology · Interpretation (philosophy · Perspective (graphical · Self · Self-consciousness · Shame · Wrongdoing · Contemporary Literature and Criticism · Emotions and Moral Behavior · Philosophy · Psychology · Social Psychology

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub