Plantness, Animalness, and Humanness
Plant placement within animacy and adjacent scales
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 8975696 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Frederick Curtis Lubbe (0000-0002-1272-6226, Institute of Botany of the Czech Academy of Sciences Třeboň Czech Republic, corresponding author), Kenny G Castillo Alfonzo (0000-0002-6214-8452, Department of French Studies University of Western Ontario London Ontario Canada) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 54 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 136-166 |
| Publication date | 2024-01-06 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0021-8308 • E-ISSN: 1468-5914 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/jtsb.12410 |
| OpenAlex | W4390636664 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 3 |
| References cited | 171 |
Animacy is an important framework through which humans view and categorize the world, but many objects do not easily fit within this scale. Plants are unique because they are very familiar to humans, yet the features and traits relevant for placement within the animacy scale are generally poorly understood by the public. Animacy occurs at three levels, with the inherent attributes of the object (biology), how they are perceived (cognition), and how they are expressed in languages (linguistics). Animacy is dependent on qualification and perception as alive, mobile, and intentional. In the absence of visible movement, classification is dependent on featural attributes indicating mobility or placement in a group recognized as animate (animalness). Plants have complicated bodies whose forms and structures are frequently clear representations of their life history and function (plantness), more than many animals, yet these signs of movement and activity are rarely recognized. The animacy scale may be more closely based on human similarity (humanness) with humans as the peak of life, mobility, and intentionality. As humans, we can have an anthropocentric viewpoint, rendering plants as scenery or utility, or use anthropomorphic interaction to better understand and recognize the dynamic lives of plants. The goal of this review is to compare the current evidence on the placement of plants within animacy and adjacent scales with the biology and habit of land plants, to better understand human perception and behaviour, and work with this process to educate and inform people about the complex lives of plants
Animacy · Cartography · Categorization · Cognition · Cognitive psychology · Cognitive science · Geography · Object (grammar · Perception · Scale (ratio · Similarity (geometry · Animal and Plant Science Education · Artificial Intelligence · Computer Science · Neuroscience · Plant and animal studies · Plant and Biological Electrophysiology Studies · Psychology · Social Psychology
Three Quests for Human Nature
Defining Agency
The mind behind anthropomorphic thinking
Plant blindness and the implications for plant conservation
When We Need A Human
The twenty most charismatic species
On seeing human
Plant blindness and sustainability
Plant Philosophy and Interpretation
A simple definition of ‘intentionally’
Unusual artifacts
Animacy Distinctions Arise from Iterated Learning
The Cognitive Bases of Anthropomorphism
Stop avoiding the inevitable
Animacy norms for 224 European Portuguese concrete words
The secret life of plants
Predicting Intentions to Engage With Scientific Messages on Twitter
The philosophy of plant neurobiology
The 'Australopithecine' Cobble from Makapansgat, South Africa
The Folk Concept of Intentionality
Humans, Animals, Things and Animacy
Cognitive animacy and its relation to linguistic animacy
Do Birds of a Feather Flock Together
Animacy and egophoricity
Nonhuman Charisma
The materiality of plants
Learning the Grammar of Animacy1
| Unique citing works | 3 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 3 |
| Citation span | 2025 - 2026 (2) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 3 |