The Great Debate and the Origins of South African Historiography

Bibliographic Data

ID8976791
AuthorsLeslie Bank (0000-0002-8506-7401, University of the Western Cape, corresponding author), Andrew Bank
Year1997
Volume38
Issue2
Pages261-281
Publication date1997-07-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueThe Journal of African History (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0021-8537 • E-ISSN: 1469-5138
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/s0021853797006993
OpenAlexW2062178904
LanguageEN
Citations received13

The fundamental preoccupation with race in later historical writing in South Africa has its origins in the Great Debate between liberals and their enemies in the early nineteenth century. Standard overviews of South African historiography date the emergence of racially structured histories to the second half of the nineteenth century. For Saunders, the making of the South African past and its thematic ordering in terms of race only began in the 1870s ‘when the first major historian [G. M. Theal] began to write his history’. Prior to Theal's monumental efforts, ‘only a few amateur historians had turned their hands to the writing of the history of particular areas or topics’. Likewise, in Smith's analysis, also published in 1988, the construction of South African history in terms of race is seen almost exclusively as the product of the late nineteenth and twentieth centuries. In a very brief introductory section, Smith suggests that what little historical writing there was before the middle of the nineteenth century is scarcely to be taken seriously, and his study offers no more than a bare outline of historiographical developments before Theal and his heirs

Amateur · Archaeology · Historiography · Race (biology · Sociology · Classics · Gender Studies · History · South African History and Culture

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub