The Protectorate Paragraph of the Wichalē Treaty
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 8978555 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Sven Rubenson (corresponding author) |
| Year | 1964 |
| Volume | 5 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 243-283 |
| Publication date | 1964-07-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The Journal of African History (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0021-8537 • E-ISSN: 1469-5138 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0021853700004837 |
| OpenAlex | W2060447666 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 18 |
| References cited | 1 |
The problems connected with Article XVII of the Wi c̣ halē (Uccialli) treaty of 1889 form one of the most important issues in the history of Ethiopian-Italian relations. The Italian government claimed that this Article made Ethiopia an Italian protectorate. There was, however, a significant discrepancy between the Amharic and Italian versions of the Article. Minīlik refused to accept the ‘protection’ of Italy; diplomacy failed to solve the conflict, and the battle of Adwa followed. The absolute independence of Ethiopia was then recognized. But the idea that Ethiopia was an Italian protectorate from 1889 to 1896 has nevertheless been maintained by Italian authors and generally accepted by most writers on Ethiopian history to this day. A careful study of Italian-Ethiopian relations during the years preceding the Wi c̣ hale treaty, as well as of the immediate circumstances under which it was signed, reveals that the Italian negotiator Antonelli, and not Minīlik or his interpreter Yosēf, was guilty of creating the imbroglio. Antonelli was not ignorant of the Amharic language, and he had personally worded the Italian draft, which changed an earlier offer by the Italian government to act as the Emperor's ‘postman’ into an obligation for him to conduct his foreign affairs through Italian channels. Since this change was not introduced in the Amharic version, which had equal authority, the conclusion must be that the ‘protectorate paragraph’ never had any validity whatsoever. The Italian protectorate was not terminated by the battle of Adwa. It had never existed
Amharic · Ancient history · Battle · Colonialism · Diplomacy · Emperor · Linguistics · Political science · Politics · Protectorate · Seriousness · Treaty · African history and culture analysis · African history and culture studies · History · Italian Fascism and Post-war Society · Law · Philosophy
Angola and Mozambique, 1870–1905
East Africa 1870–1905
French Congo and Gabon 1886–1905
Africa on the Eve of Partition
Western Africa, 1870–1886
Western Africa, 1886–1905
North Africa
Madagascar and France, 1870–1905
A History of Ethiopia
The European Partition of Africa
The European Scramble and Conquest in African History
King Leopold's Congo, 1886–1908
Völkerrechtliche Beziehungen zwischen Äthiopien und Italien im Lichte des Vertrages von Uccialli/Wuchale (1889), written by Hatem Elliesie
The Cambridge History of Africa
British government, finance capitalists and the French Jibuti‐Addis Ababa railway 1898–1913
African International Legal Histories – International Law in Africa
The Survival of the Secret Treaty
Professor Giglio, Antonelli and Article XVII of the Treaty of Wichalē
| Unique citing works | 18 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,3 |
| Citation span | 1966 - 2021 (56) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 18 |