Fiercely Independent, Tentatively National
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 8998196 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Yeo Min Hui (corresponding author) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 84 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 30-54 |
| Publication date | 2025-01-08 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The Journal of Asian Studies (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0021-9118 • E-ISSN: 1752-0401 |
| Publisher | Duke University Press (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1215/00219118-11445279 |
| OpenAlex | W4406185607 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 5 |
Wildly popular in the 1960s and fondly remembered today as “Singapore's own Bond,” “Malaysia's own Bond,” and “Malay James Bond,” the Jefri Zain and Nora Zain films (1966–68) occupy a significant spot in film and cultural history. Yet very little has hitherto been written about these films. Particularly worth probing is how these films engaged with the global Bondmania and political zeitgeist of the tumultuous 1960s. It remains little known that many of these films were adapted contemporaneously from Hong Kong Mandarin James Bond films and that the Zain heroes were deeply embroiled in then–newly independent Singapore's national politics both on-screen and off-screen. Bringing this history to light unfolds a new, critical perspective on these popular icons. More importantly, through examining the films’ peculiar Britain–Hong Kong–Singapore/Malaysia adaptation route, this article illuminates the complex geopolitics that undergird James Bond film remakes set in former British colonies. It demonstrates that, in the case of Singapore and Malaysia, remaking James Bond films was both a consequence, and an assertion, of postcolonial independence. The films’ on-screen manifestations and off-screen motivations signify a particular expression of postcolonial independence—fiercely independent, tentatively national—that is specific to their extraordinary circumstantial conditions
Genealogy · Political science · Cinema and Media Studies · History · Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism · Socioeconomic Development in Asia
| Highly cited | No |
|---|