How morality signals, benefits, binds, and teaches

Bibliographic Data

ID9007477
AuthorsNate C Carnes (0000-0003-4385-8827, California State University, San Marcos, corresponding author), B Allmon (California State University, San Marcos), Joaquin R Alva (California State University, San Marcos), J Alva, Kayleigh A Cousar (California State University, San Marcos), Z D Varnam (California State University, San Marcos)
Year2022
Volume101
Pages104313-104313
Publication date2022-03-21
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Experimental Social Psychology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0022-1031 • E-ISSN: 1096-0465
PublisherElsevier BV (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1016/j.jesp.2022.104313
OpenAlexW4220763334
LanguageEN
Citations received5
References cited74

We hypothesize that people can use the extremity of their moral intuitions—the extent to which something feels moral versus immoral—to make functional social inferences that signal inner character, benefit individual welfare, bind groups together, and teach normative behavior. We find strong support for this hypotheses across four preregistered studies (N = 1224). Our measure of these social functions has four reliable, distinct dimensions that map onto signaling, benefiting, binding, and teaching (Studies 1–3). These social functions uniquely predict judgments of morality and immorality across a wide variety of moral contexts (Study 1), and experimentally manipulating the operation of these social functions causes stronger moral judgments (Study 4). Critically, an experimental manipulation of moral extremity—in which participants write about their own recalled (Study 2) or hypothetical (Study 3) moral event of varying severity—causes stronger inferences about these social functions. Aggregate analyses provide complementary support these hypotheses. Finally, we discuss how morality facilitates life in groups and the asymmetries between moral versus immoral judgment

Cognition · Epistemology · Immorality · Moral character · Moral development · Moral disengagement · Morality · Normative · Social cognitive theory of morality · Cultural Differences and Values · Neuroscience · Psychology · Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment · Social and Intergroup Psychology · Social Psychology

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access