Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Social Desirability Response Sets and a Measure of Self-Actualization

Bibliographic Data

ID9020871
AuthorsRobert G Warehime (corresponding author), Melvin L Foulds
Year1973
Volume13
Issue1
Pages89-95
Publication date1973-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Humanistic Psychology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0022-1678 • E-ISSN: 1552-650X
PublisherSAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/002216787301300113
OpenAlexW2026610269
LanguageEN
Citations received7
References cited6

The Personal Orientation Inventory (POI), found to be resistant to simulate-good-impression instructions in previous investigations, was correlated with measures of the social desirability response set. Data were in agreement with a prediction of significant positive Edwards Social Desirability scale-POI correlations. Also, as predicted, Marlowe-Crowne Social Desirability scale-POI correlations were nonsignificant or significant in the negative direction. These data were discussed in terms of the difference between the self-actualization model, on the basis of which the POI was constructed, and cultural definitions of the socially desirable. The Personal Orientation Inventory (Shostrom, 1966), constructed as a measure of one conception of the ideal personality, self-actualization (Maslow, 1962), has been found to be resistant to good-impression instructions (Fisher, in press; Foulds & Warehime, 1971; Shostrom, 1966). In comparison with the normal instruction set, the "fake good" instruction set lowered scores significantly on most POI scales. A possible explanation for these findings may be found in the way the POI scales are keyed. There is high agreement among persons in our culture as to the social desirability value of personality scale items, and most personality scales are implicitly keyed in the direction of generally accepted cultural standards (Edwards, 1970). The POI, however, is not keyed in the direction of cultural norms but in the direction of the self-actualization model of personality. Behaviors defining self-actualization are somewhat different from behaviors defining currently accepted cultural standards, and subjects may simply lack information about what constitutes a self-actualized response on the POI. Grater (1968) found that both good impression instructions and knowledge of the characteristics of self-actualized persons were necessary for subjects to distort their POI responses appreciably in the self-actualization direction. The present study was an investigation of the relationship between POI performance and the tendency to create a favorable impression, this tendency being considered as an individual difference variable (the social desirability response set). The Marlowe-Crowne Social Desirability scale (MC SD; Crowne & Marlowe, 1960, 1964) was constructed as a measure of the tendency to create a favorable impression, independent of the report or denial of psychopathology. The MC SD scale should have nonsignificant or negative correlations with the POI scales, since both high and low MC SD scorers should be equally lacking in information about the self-actualization model. In addition, where the self-actualization model is at wide variance with cultural definitions of ideal behavior, persons attuned to cultural norms (and dissimulating in terms of these) should have lower scores on the POI scales representing these behaviors than persons who do not dissimulate in such a fashion. The Edwards Social Desirability scale (ED SD; Edwards, 1957) was constructed as a measure of the tendency to endorse personality statements in the socially desirable direction. ED SD responses can be interpreted, however, either in terms of denial of psychopathology (a social desirability interpretation) or in terms of report of actual adjustment or absence of psychopathology (Crowne & Marlowe, 1960; Heilbrun, 1964). Edwards (1970) presented evidence that indicates that judgments of social desirability are highly correlated with judgments of sickness-health, normality-abnormality, and adjustment-maladjustment. Consequently, a significant positive correlation should be found between the ED SD scale and the POI scales, since the constructs of self-actualization and adjustment-maladjustment are not completely independent and their corresponding measures should be somewhat related

Big Five personality traits · Orientation (vector space · Personality · Scale (ratio · Self-Actualization · Set (abstract data type · Social desirability · Mathematics · Psychology · Social and Intergroup Psychology · Social Psychology

  • Role of social desirability in personality testing for personnel selection

    Deniz S Ones, Chockalingam Viswesvaran et al.•Journal of Applied Psychology•1996

  • The Development of Meaning in Life †

    John Battista, John R Battista et al.•Psychiatry•1973

  • Knowledge about self-actualization and the presentation of self as self-actualized

    Robert G Warehime, Donald K Routh et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•1974

  • Defensive Repressors and Empathic Impairment

    Open Access•Lawrence E Nielsen, J Roland Fleck•Psychological Reports•1981

  • Parental Self-Actualization and Children's Self-Concept

    Open Access•Mark King, M E King•Psychological Reports•1979

  • Sexual satisfaction in marriage as a function of life meaning

    Open Access•Joseph T McCann, Mary Kay Biaggio•Archives of Sexual Behavior•1989

  • The Fakability of the Personality Orientation Inventory

    Open Access•Mary R Prescott, Jerry C Cavatta et al.•Counselor Education and Supervision•1977

  • The social desirability variable in personality assessment and research

    Allen Louis Edwards•The social desirability variable…•1982

  • Toward a psychology of being.

    Abraham H Maslow, Abraham Maslow•1962

  • A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology.

    Douglas P Crowne, David Marlowe•Journal of Consulting Psychology•1960

  • Social-learning theory, social desirability, and the MMPI

    Alfred B Heilbrun•Psychological Bulletin•1964

Unique citing works7
Citations per year0,13
Citation span1973 - 1996 (24)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 7

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae