Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

William James and the Fight for Science

Bibliographic Data

ID9020919
AuthorsLouis Hoffman (0000-0002-4288-0072, University of the Rockies, Colorado Springs, CO, USA,, corresponding author), Matt Thelen (University of the Rockies, Colorado Springs, CO, USA)
Year2010
Volume50
Issue4
Pages430-439
Publication date2010-07-15
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Humanistic Psychology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0022-1678 • E-ISSN: 1552-650X
PublisherSAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/0022167810373397
OpenAlexW2165698204
LanguageEN
References cited14

William James, the foremost psychologist in American history, contributed broadly to the field of psychology across various specializations. Of prime importance are his contributions to the neglected field of the philosophy of science in psychology. The field of psychology, in ignoring its philosophical foundations, has developed a number of problems to which a Jamesian psychology speaks. In particular, professional psychology is in the midst of a renewed debate over measuring the effectiveness of therapy. Although this debate emerged long after James’s death, many problems that surfaced with this controversy are directly relevant to the philosophical and metaphysical foundations central to James’s contributions. Through applying James’s ideas, it is demonstrated that the approaches to evaluating therapy outcomes rooted solely in a narrowly defined science reflect regression, not progress, in the development of the field of psychology. Furthermore, evidence-based practice in psychology, when defined in a broad and inclusive manner, is more in line with what James viewed as a mature academic discipline

Epistemology · Field (mathematics · History of psychology · Metaphysics · Philosophy of psychology · Philosophy of science · Psychology of science · Sociology · Theoretical psychology · Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology · Philosophy · Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education · Psychology · Social Representations and Identity

  • The Structure of scientific theories

    Frederick Suppe•The Structure of scientific…•1977

  • The principles of psychology.

    William James•1913

  • The heart and soul of change

    Barry L Duncan, Scott D Miller et al.•The heart and soul of change•2010

  • Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes

    Open Access•I LAKATOS, И Лакатос•Criticism and the Growth of…•1970

  • The Treadmill of Production

    Open Access•Richard York, John Bellamy Foster•Organization & Environment•2005

  • On the Nature of a Critical Methodology

    Open Access•Stephen C Yanchar, Edwin E Gantt et al.•Theory & Psychology•2005

  • Clarification and elaboration on evidence-based practice in psychology

    Bruce E Wampold, Carol D Goodheart et al.•American Psychologist•2007

  • Implications for psychology of the new philosophy of science

    Peter T Manicas, Paul F Secord•American Psychologist•1983

  • On evidence and evidence-based medicine

    Open Access•Maya J Goldenberg•Social Science & Medicine•2006

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae