Bohm's Dialogue and Action Science
Two Different Approaches
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 9022256 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Mario Cayer (Université Laval, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1997 |
| Volume | 37 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 41-66 |
| Publication date | 1997-04-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Humanistic Psychology (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0022-1678 • E-ISSN: 1552-650X |
| Publisher | SAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/00221678970372009 |
| OpenAlex | W2074358725 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 5 |
| References cited | 7 |
This article claims that Bohm's dialogue could best serve individuals, organizations, and society if it is not assimilated into merely being a tool used in organizational development. After presenting first Bohm's dialogue and second Argyris's action science, similarities and differences between these two approaches are outlined. It is demonstrated that fundamental points distinguish these approaches, such as their purposes and the faculties they attempt to develop in the human being. In the last section, considering the dead end toward which our society and humanity are heading, it is suggested that Bohm's dialogue, when freed from its utilitarian yoke, could be a way to accede to Learning III, a necessity for our organizations, our society, and ourselves
Action (physics · Epistemology · Heading (navigation · Humanity · Political science · Sociology · Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics · Law · Management and Organizational Studies · Philosophy · Psychology · Social Representations and Identity
| Unique citing works | 5 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,18 |
| Citation span | 1998 - 2005 (8) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 5 |