Crisis intervention for ghetto children
Contraindications and alternative considerations
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 9052376 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Ruth L LaVietes (New York Medical College, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1974 |
| Volume | 44 |
| Issue | 5 |
| Pages | 720-727 |
| Publication date | 1974-10-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | American Journal of Orthopsychiatry (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0002-9432 • E-ISSN: 1939-0025 |
| Publisher | American Psychological Association (APA) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1939-0025.1974.tb01150.x |
| PMID | 4215324 |
| OpenAlex | W1518061048 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 3 |
| References cited | 7 |
Clinicians and administrators have emphasized crisis intervention as a means of extending services and reducing costs. This paper asserts that ghetto children, because of their multiple deprivations, complex problems, and family structures, are particularly unsuitable for short-term contacts. Modalities other than crisis intervention are indicated as alternatives to long-term child treatment
Criminology · Crisis intervention · Intervention (counseling) · Psychiatry · Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health · Homelessness and Social Issues · Medicine · Migration, Health and Trauma · Psychology
| Unique citing works | 3 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,06 |
| Citation span | 1976 - 1983 (8) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 3 |