Snake oil, ethics and the first amendment
What's a profession to do
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 9053385 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Sheila Suess Kennedy (Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis), Jean Mercer (0000-0003-3217-3953, Stockton University), Wanda K Mohr (Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis), Wanda Mohr, Charles W Huffine |
| Year | 2002 |
| Volume | 72 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 5-15 |
| Publication date | 2002-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | American Journal of Orthopsychiatry (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0002-9432 • E-ISSN: 1939-0025 |
| Publisher | American Psychological Association (APA) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1037//0002-9432.72.1.5 |
| PMID | 14964590 |
| OpenAlex | W2122808893 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 3 |
This article considers the appropriate legal and ethical response to those whose advocacy of "alternative" or unvalidated therapies places people at risk of harm. What are our professional responsibilities with respect to such advocacy, and what sorts of harm will justify government intervention?
Criminology · Do no harm · Engineering ethics · First amendment · Government (linguistics) · Harm · Intervention (counseling) · Legal Ethics · Political science · Professional ethics · Professional responsibility · Supreme court · Biomedical Ethics and Regulation · Engineering · Law · Medicine · Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations · Nursing · Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare · Psychology
| Unique citing works | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,1 |
| Citation span | 2016 - 2016 (1) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 1 |