Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

R. B. Braithwaite’s influence on Bion’s epistemological contributions

Bibliographic Data

ID9056480
AuthorsBarnet D Malin (0000-0002-5008-5386, Psychoanalytic Center of California, Los Angeles, USA, corresponding author)
Year2021
Volume102
Issue4
Pages653-670
Publication date2021-07-04
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueThe International Journal of Psychoanalysis (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0020-7578 • E-ISSN: 1745-8315
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/00207578.2021.1875835
PMID34357845
OpenAlexW3158045191
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited12

This paper presents evidence that Bion's epistemological contributions drew on the work of R. B. Braithwaite, a British philosopher of science, more than has generally been acknowledged. Braithwaite introduced the "scientific deductive system", a term Bion adopted. It proposed that empirical scientific methods could be applied to immaterial subjects of study, including "unconscious mental processes" (Braithwaite 1953, ix). Bion's private work journal, collected in Cogitations, documents Braithwaite's direct influence throughout its entries, particularly in one dated 10 January 1959, entitled "Scientific method" (Bion 1959b). This paper reviews relevant elements of Braithwaite's work, and examines Bion's "Scientific method" and samples from his epistemological work to argue that one of Bion's goals was to bring an empirically based scientific model to psychoanalytic theory and clinical practice. More than a matter of academic interest, Braithwaite's work lends pragmatically useful context to understand Bion's theoretical and clinical intentions in greater depth. It also suggests the main reasons why his project did not come fully to fruition, which led Bion to turn from the scientific deductive system towards his later developments

Context (archaeology) · Epistemology · Psychoanalysis · Psychoanalytic theory · Sociology · Unconscious mind · Work (physics) · Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology · Engineering · History · Mental Health and Psychiatry · Philosophy · Philosophy and History of Science · Psychology

  • “Reappraising John O. Wisdom’s Critique of W.R. Bion’s Learning from Experience at a meeting of the British Psychoanalytical Society—17 October 1964.”

    Joseph Aguayo•The International Journal of…•2022

  • The sources of the concept of extension in the work of W. R. Bion

    Didier Houzel•The International Journal of…•2022

  • Peirce’s Theory of Abduction

    Open Access•K T Fann•Peirce's Theory of Abduction•1970

  • The Function of General Laws in History

    Carl G Hempel•The Journal of Philosophy•1942

  • Aristotle on the Common Sense

    Pavel Gregoric•Aristotle on the Common Sense…•2007

  • R. B. Braithwaite (1900–1990)

    D H Mellor•The British Journal for the…•1990

  • A Definition of “Degree of Confirmation”

    Open Access•Carl G Hempel, Paul Oppenheim•Philosophy of Science•1945

  • Studies in the Logic of Explanation

    Open Access•Carl G Hempel, Paul Oppenheim•Philosophy of Science•1948

  • John Rickman behind the scenes

    R D Hinshelwood•The International Journal of…•2018

  • The origins of bion's work1

    Open Access•Paulo César Sandler•The International Journal of…•2006

  • Panel Report

    Open Access•Dale E Panzer•Journal of the American…•2008

Unique citing works2
Citations per year0,5
Citation span2022 - 2022 (1)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 2

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae