Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Differences in the Treatment of Myocardial Infarction Between the United States and Canada

A Survey of Physicians in the Gusto Trial

Bibliographic Data

ID9096136
AuthorsLouise Pilote (0000-0002-6159-0628, corresponding author), Chris Granger, C B Granger, Paul W Armstrong (0000-0002-0460-3445, University of Alberta), Daniel B Mark (0000-0001-6340-8087), Mark A Hlatky (0000-0003-4686-9441, corresponding author)
Year1995
Volume33
Issue6
Pages598-610
Publication date1995-06-01
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueMedical Care (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0025-7079 • E-ISSN: 1537-1948
PublisherOvid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1097/00005650-199506000-00003
PMID7760576
OpenAlexW2009640517
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited1

Treatment of acute myocardial infarction differs between the United States and Canada, but the reasons for these practice pattern differences remain elusive. To investigate whether physician beliefs and access to procedures account for these differences in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction, a random sample of physicians involved in the Global Utilization of Streptokinase and Tissue Plasminogen Activator for Occluded Coronary Arteries trial in the United States (n = 332) and Canada (n = 200) was surveyed. We found that American physicians recommend coronary angiography after uncomplicated infarction significantly more (median: 7 versus 3 of 11 possible indications, P = 0.0001). Coronary angiography, angioplasty, and bypass surgery were available in-hospital to more American than Canadian physicians (77% versus 41%), and the reported waiting period for cardiac procedures in a stable patient was longer in Canada (angiography: 28 versus 1.5 days; angioplasty: 30 versus 2 days; bypass surgery: 84 versus 3 days, all P < 0.001). More American than Canadian physicians were cardiologists (88% versus 74%), and more were interventional cardiologists (61% versus 26%). American physicians more highly rated the importance of patient requests, malpractice, and insurance coverage, whereas Canadians more highly rated availability of cardiac procedures as influencing clinical decisions. After statistical adjustment for these factors, however, Americans remained significantly more likely to recommend coronary angiography

Angiography · Angioplasty · Artery · Bypass surgery · Cardiology · Coronary angiography · Myocardial infarction · Streptokinase · Tissue plasminogen activator · Emergency Medicine · Healthcare cost, quality, practices · Healthcare Policy and Management · Internal Medicine · Medicine · Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare

  • Understanding Individual and Small Area Variation in the Underuse of Coronary Angiography Following Acute Myocardial Infarction

    Pushkal P Garg, Pushkal Garg et al.•Medical Care•2002

  • Impact of Geographic Proximity to Cardiac Revascularization Services on Service Utilization

    Patrice M Gregory, Edmond S Malka et al.•Medical Care•2000

  • Comparing the Use of Diagnostic Tests in Canadian and US Hospitals

    Steven Katz, Steven J Katz et al.•Medical Care•1996

  • Placing patients in the queue for coronary revascularization

    C David Naylor, Antoni Basinski et al.•American Journal of Public Health•1990

Citations per year0.1
Citation span1996 - 2002 (7)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae