Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Differences in Patients, Surgical Complexity, and Outcomes After Cancer Surgery at National Cancer Institute-designated Cancer Centers Compared to Other Hospitals

Bibliographic Data

ID9096443
AuthorsRyan P Merkow (0000-0002-8752-4653, University of Chicago, corresponding author), David J Bentrem (Jesse Brown VA Medical Center), Jae Wan Chung (0000-0002-9015-4622), Jeanette W Chung, Jennifer L Paruch (0000-0003-0668-1890, University of Chicago, corresponding author), Clifford Y Ko (0000-0003-3186-8673, University of California, Los Angeles, corresponding author), Karl Y Bilimoria (0000-0001-5067-1345, American College of Surgeons, corresponding author)
Year2013
Volume51
Issue7
Pages606-613
Publication date2013-07-01
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueMedical Care (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0025-7079 • E-ISSN: 1537-1948
PublisherOvid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1097/mlr.0b013e3182928f44
PMID23604012
OpenAlexW2059724233
LanguageEN
References cited3

BACKGROUND: Interest in comparing hospital surgical quality continues to increase, particularly with respect to examining certain hospital designations such as National Cancer Institute-designated Cancer Centers (NCI-CC). Our objectives were to compare patients, surgical complexity, and risk-adjusted 30-day outcomes following major cancer surgery at NCI-CC versus non-NCI centers. METHODS: From the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program, patients were identified who underwent colorectal, pancreatic, or esophagogastric resection for cancer (2007-2011). Regression methods were used to evaluate characteristics associated with undergoing treatment at NCI-CCs and surgical-complexity-adjusted 30-day morbidity, mortality, and prolonged length-of-stay at NCI-CC versus non-NCI centers. RESULTS: NCI-CCs performed 20.2% of colorectal (10,555/52,265), 53.5% of pancreatic (6335/11,838), and 49.8% of esophagogastric (1596/3208) operations for cancer. NCI-CCs were more likely to treat patients who were younger, white, and with fewer comorbidities, but were more likely to perform more complex procedures including synchronous liver resection (eg, colorectal), adjacent organ resections (rectal cancer), and vascular reconstructions (eg, pancreas) (all P<0.05). NCI-CCs had a lower mortality rate for colorectal surgery only (1.2% vs. 1.9%) and increased rates of superficial surgical site infection (SSI) for colorectal (9.8% vs. 7.1%) and pancreatic (10.7% vs. 8.8%) surgery. No differences existed for the remaining complications by NCI-CC designation status. NCI-CCs were distributed throughout hospital quality rankings for all procedures and complications assessed. CONCLUSIONS: NCI-CCs treated younger, healthier patients, but performed more complex procedures. Patients treated at NCI-CCs had a lower risk of mortality for colorectal resection, but morbidity was similar to non-NCI centers. Comparison of cancer surgery hospital quality is feasible and should adjust for differences in patient demographics, comorbidities, and surgical complexity

Cancer · Colorectal cancer · Gastrointestinal cancer · General surgery · Pancreatic cancer · Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments · Global Cancer Incidence and Screening · Internal Medicine · Medicine · Oncology · Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research · Surgery

  • Should Operations Be Regionalized?

    Harold S Luft, John P Bunker et al.•New England Journal of Medicine•1979

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae