Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The Effect of Referral and Transfer Patients on Hospital Funding in a Capitated Health Care Delivery System

Bibliographic Data

ID9096781
AuthorsKenneth Pietz (Health Affairs, corresponding author), Mother Martin Byrne (0000-0002-8143-4702, University of Miami), Margaret M Byrne, Christina Daw (Baylor College of Medicine, corresponding author), Laura A Petersen (0000-0003-0875-1231, Health Affairs, corresponding author)
LanguageEN
References cited16

OBJECTIVES: (1) To investigate whether inpatients referred or transferred between facilities result in increased financial loss compared with those admitted directly, in a health care delivery system funded by capitation methods. (2) To determine whether the higher cost of those patients transferred or referred is fairly compensated by a diagnosis-based risk adjustment system, and whether tertiary care facilities bear an unfair financial burden for such patients in a capitated financing environment. METHODS: The study cohort included all Veterans Affairs (VA) beneficiaries who received inpatient care during fiscal year (FY) 2004. Referral was defined as an outpatient visit to 1 facility followed by an admission to another facility. Transfers were consecutive inpatient stays at different hospitals. We defined loss as cost minus the share of budget determined by a Diagnostic Cost Group-based allocation. Both t tests and linear regression were used to compare the effect on cost and loss for patients transferred or not and referred or not. RESULTS: Mean loss to a facility for patients transferred in was 1231 dollars more than for those not transferred. Mean loss for referred patients was 3341 dollars more than for those not referred, controlling for disease burden. For tertiary hospitals, the difference in losses for transfer patients was less than for other hospitals but greater for referral patients. CONCLUSIONS: Patients referred or transferred from other facilities are more costly than those who are not. The difference may not be compensated by a diagnosis-based allocation system. A capitated health care system may consider additional funding to cover the cost of such patients

Ambulatory care · Business · Capitation · Capitation fee · Family medicine · Fiscal year · Health care · Medical emergency · Referral · Veterans Affairs · Emergency Medicine · Finance · Healthcare Operations and Scheduling Optimization · Healthcare Policy and Management · Healthcare Systems and Technology · Internal Medicine · Medicine

  • Evaluating VA Patient-Level Expenditures

    Ann Hendricks, Ann M Hendricks et al.•Medical Care•2003

  • A Decision-Theoretic Approach to Identifying Future High-Cost Patients

    Kenneth Pietz, Eliseo Izquierdo Pérez et al.•Medical Care•2006

  • Does Receiving Referral and Transfer Patients Make Hospitals Expensive

    Stephen F Jencks, Joel D Bobula et al.•Medical Care•1988

  • Effect of Using Information From Only One System for Dually Eligible Health Care Users

    Mother Martin Byrne, Margaret M Byrne et al.•Medical Care•2006

  • VA Community-Based Outpatient Clinics

    Matthew L Maciejewski, Michael K Chapko et al.•Medical Care•2002

  • Ranking Hospitals According to Acute Myocardial Infarction Mortality

    Mylène Kosseim, Nancy E Mayo et al.•Medical Care•2006

  • Applying Diagnostic Cost Groups to Examine the Disease Burden of VA Facilities

    Amy K Rosen, Susan Loveland et al.•Medical Care•2003

Highly citedNo
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae