Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Reliability Estimates of Clinical Measures Between Minimum Data Set and Online Survey Certification and Reporting Data of US Nursing Homes

Bibliographic Data

ID9097609
AuthorsNing Jackie Zhang (0009-0003-9444-1535, University of Central Florida), Seung Chun Paek (0000-0002-9483-5572, University of Central Florida), Thomas T H Wan (0000-0002-5235-4586, University of Central Florida)
Year2009
Volume47
Issue4
Pages492-495
Publication date2009-04-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueMedical Care (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0025-7079 • E-ISSN: 1537-1948
PublisherOvid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1097/mlr.0b013e31818c014b
PMID19330893
OpenAlexW2085986101
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited13

BACKGROUND: Evidence-based quality improvement in nursing homes relies heavily on administrative data. Minimum Data Set (MDS) and Online Survey Certification and Reporting (OSCAR) are the 2 largest sources of national nursing home administrative data. Although clinical measures in each of the data systems have frequently and independently been used to measure nursing home performance, no study has systematically examined their relative reliability. OBJECTIVES: This study estimates the reliability of clinical measures between MDS and OSCAR data and discusses the utility of these databases in research. RESEARCH DESIGN: We analyzed 4 waves of national MDS and OSCAR data (1999-2002). A comparable group of 24 clinical indicators from both datasets was selected for the reliability test. Spearman rank-order correlation analyses were used to measure the test-retest reliability relationships. RESULTS: Across the 4 years, the majority of coefficients of clinical measures exhibit good reliability. There are 17 clinical measures (71% of the total measures) with correlation coefficients greater than 0.4, the minimally acceptable reliability threshold according to Morris. The highest correlation coefficients were associated with tube feeding at 0.883. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that the target clinical measures in OSCAR and MDS are generally consistent and reliable. However, researchers should use OSCAR self-reported clinical measures to measure nursing home outcomes in place of corresponding MDS clinical measures with caution because some indicators in the administrative data are more reliable than others

Certification · Data quality · Metric (unit) · Minimum Data Set · Nursing homes · Operations management · Rank correlation · Reliability (semiconductor) · Statistics · Test (biology) · Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes · Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving · Mathematics · Medicine · Nursing · Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation

  • Trajectories of Functional Change Among Long Stayers in Nursing Homes

    Open Access•Jane Banaszak-Holl, Jersey Liang et al.•Journal of Aging and Health•2011

  • Changes in the Socioeconomic Pattern of Smoking Among Male Adults in Thailand from 2001 to 2021

    Open Access•Rula Sa, Seung Chun Paek•SAGE Open•2024

  • MDS Cognitive Performance Scale(C)

    John N Morris, Brant E Fries et al.•Journal of Gerontology•1994

  • Designing the National Resident Assessment Instrument for Nursing Homes

    J N Morris, Jack Morris et al.•The Gerontologist•1990

  • A Comprehensive Clinical Assessment Tool to Inform Policy and Practice

    Vincent Mor•Medical Care•2004

  • Stability of Nursing Home Quality Indicators Over Time

    Sarita L Karon, François Sainfort et al.•Medical Care•1999

Unique citing works2
Citations per year0.13
Citation span2011 - 2024 (14)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 2

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae