Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Relationship Between Patient-reported Outcomes of Elective Surgery and Hospital and Consultant Volume

Bibliographic Data

ID9097663
AuthorsMira Varagunam (London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine), Andrew Hutchings (0000-0003-0215-9923, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine), Nick Black (0000-0003-4771-3481, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine)
Year2015
Volume53
Issue4
Pages310-316
Publication date2015-04-01
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueMedical Care (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0025-7079 • E-ISSN: 1537-1948
PublisherOvid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1097/mlr.0000000000000318
PMID25654295
OpenAlexW2040968787
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited26

OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to analyze the relationship for 3 elective operations between outcome [patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for functional status, health-related quality of life, and postoperative complications] and both hospital and consultant volume. METHODS: Hospitals (NHS and independent) and consultants undertaking at least 10 NHS-funded procedures during 2011/2012 were included (230 hospitals for hip and knee replacement, 257 for hernia repair; 978 consultants for hip replacement, 1172 for knee replacement, and 1288 for hernia repair). Outcomes (disease-specific and generic PROMs, patient-reported complications) were available from the NHS National PROMs Programme for 2009/2010 to 2011/2012. Relationship between case-mix adjusted outcomes and volume investigated using multilevel modeling. RESULTS: There was considerable variation in hospital volumes (about 10-fold) and consultant volumes (about 5-fold). No significant association was observed between hospital volume and outcome for all 3 procedures. For consultant volume, there was no significant association for knee replacement or hernia repair. However, outcomes were statistically significantly better for hip replacement, although the effect was of little clinical significance: an additional 10 cases was associated with a higher Oxford Hip Score (0.06), higher EQ-5D score (0.001), and lower odds ratio of complications (0.992). CONCLUSIONS: There are unlikely to be any benefits to patients from centralization of elective surgery into higher volume hospitals as regards the effectiveness of surgery or the avoidance of minor complications. There is some evidence that very low volume consultants achieve poorer outcomes than higher volume colleagues but the difference is slight and of little or no clinical significance

Elective surgery · General surgery · MEDLINE · Political science · Volume (thermodynamics) · Hip and Femur Fractures · Medicine · Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty · Surgery · Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes

  • Patient-reported outcomes

    Open Access•Nick Black, L Burke et al.•Quality of Life Research•2015

  • Using Patient-reported Outcomes (PROs) to Compare the Providers of Surgery

    Jenny Neuburger, Andrew Hutchings et al.•Medical Care•2013

  • Modeling Valuations for EuroQol Health States

    Paul Dolan•Medical Care•1997

Citations per year0.09
Citation span2015 - 2015 (1)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae