Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Factors Associated With Hospices’ Nonparticipation in Medicare’s Hospice Compare Public Reporting Program

Bibliographic Data

ID9097846
AuthorsSylvia H Hsu (York University, corresponding author), Peiyin Hung (0000-0002-1529-0819, Department of Chronic Disease Epidemiology, Yale University School of Public Health, New Haven, CT), Shi-Yi Wang (Department of Chronic Disease Epidemiology, Yale University School of Public Health, New Haven, CT), Shi‐Yi Wang (0000-0002-3294-5784, Yale Cancer Center)
Year2019
Volume57
Issue1
Pages28-35
Publication date2019-01-01
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueMedical Care (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0025-7079 • E-ISSN: 1537-1948
PublisherOvid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1097/mlr.0000000000001016
PMID30489545
OpenAlexW2903532160
LanguageEN
References cited23

BACKGROUND: To enhance the quality of hospice care and to facilitate consumers' choices, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) began the Hospice Quality Reporting Program, in which CMS posted the quality measures of participating hospices on its reporting website, Hospice Compare. Little is known about the participation rate and the types of nonparticipating hospices. OBJECTIVE: To examine the factors associated with hospices' nonparticipation in Hospice Compare. RESEARCH DESIGN: We analyzed data from the CMS 2016 Hospice Compare. "Nonparticipants" were those who did not submit any quality measure. With the data of the Provider of Service file, the Healthcare Cost Report Information System, and the Area Health Resources File, multivariate logistic regressions estimated the association between nonparticipants and hospice and market characteristics, including ownership, size, nurse staffing ratio, and market competition intensity. RESULTS: Among the 4123 certified hospices subject to penalty from nonparticipation, 259 did not participate in Hospice Compare. California, New Mexico, Texas, and Wyoming had participation rates lower than 80%. Hospices that were for-profit, had no accreditation, had few nurses per patient day, provided no inpatient care, and were located in competitive markets were less likely to participate than other hospices. CONCLUSIONS: Hospice Compare successfully motivated hospice in participating in the quality report program in most of states. For-profit hospices, hospices with less quality, and hospices located in competitive markets were less likely to participate. Further research is warranted to examine the quality of these nonparticipants, especially in the 4 states with a lower participation rate

Accreditation · Business · Family medicine · Health care · Logistic regression · Medicaid · Quality (philosophy) · Staffing · Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes · Healthcare Policy and Management · Medicine · Nursing · Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues

  • The Public Release of Performance Data

    Martin Marshall, Martin N Marshall et al.•JAMA•2000

  • Ownership Status and Patterns of Care in Hospice

    Melissa Carlson, Melissa D A Carlson et al.•Medical Care•2004

  • Quality Improvement Under Nursing Home Compare

    Rachel M Werner, Rita T Konetzka et al.•Medical Care•2013

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae