Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Factors Predicting Medicare National Coverage

An Empirical Analysis

Bibliographic Data

ID9098764
AuthorsJames D Chambers (0000-0001-5696-4894, Brunel University of London, corresponding author), Stephen Morris (0000-0003-2551-9717, University College London), Peter J Neumann (0000-0003-1226-4073, Tufts Medical Center), Martin Buxton (Brunel University of London, corresponding author), Martin J Buxton
Year2012
Volume50
Issue3
Pages249-256
Publication date2012-03-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueMedical Care (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0025-7079 • E-ISSN: 1537-1948
PublisherOvid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1097/mlr.0b013e318241eb40
PMID22193418
OpenAlexW1966884056
LanguageEN
References cited12

BACKGROUND: Interventions considered to be particularly controversial or expected to significantly impact the Medicare program in the United States are considered in National Coverage Determinations. Medicare coverage for such interventions is limited to those deemed "reasonable and necessary" for the diagnosis or treatment of an illness or injury. What constitutes reasonable and necessary has not, however, been clearly defined. OBJECTIVE: To determine factors associated with positive National Coverage Determinations. RESEARCH DESIGN: A dataset of coverage decisions from 1999 to 2007 (n=195) was created with the following variables: direction of coverage decision; quality of supporting evidence; availability of alternative interventions; cost-effectiveness of intervention; type of intervention; coverage requestor; and year of decision. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to determine factors associated with positive coverage. RESULTS: The following variables were independently associated with positive Medicare coverage: good or fair quality supporting evidence (adjusted odds ratio, OR=6.04, P<0.01); presence of an alternative intervention (OR=0.130, P<0.01); no associated estimate of cost-effectiveness (OR=0.190, P<0.05). In addition, in comparison with coverage decisions made in the years 1999 to 2001, those made in the years 2002 to 2003, 2004 to 2005, and 2006 to 2007, were associated with positive coverage [ORs of 0.311 (P<0.05), 0.310 (P<0.1), and 0.109 (P<0.01), respectively]. CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest that good or fair quality supporting evidence is a strong predictor of positive coverage. Availability of alternative interventions, more recent decisions, and lack of an associated estimate of cost-effectiveness are associated with a decreased likelihood of positive coverage. The findings highlight Medicare's move to evidence-based coverage decisions, and suggest that coverage decisions are influenced by the availability of cost-effectiveness evidence

Actuarial science · Business · Intervention (counseling) · Logistic regression · Multivariate analysis · Multivariate statistics · Odds · Odds ratio · Psychological intervention · Statistics · Univariate · Chronic Disease Management Strategies · Healthcare Policy and Management · Internal Medicine · Medicine · Nursing · Primary Care and Health Outcomes

  • Qaly maximisation and people's preferences

    Open Access•Paul Dolan, Paul J Dolan et al.•Health Economics•2005

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae