Improving Informed Consent
Insights From Behavioral Decision Research
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 9098950 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Margaret Holmes-Rovner, Margaret Holmes‐Rovner (0000-0002-8725-7938, Michigan State University, autor correspondente), Celia E Wills (0000-0001-8548-1517, Michigan State University) |
| Ano | 2002 |
| Volume | 40 |
| Fascículo | Supplement |
| Páginas | V-30-V-38 |
| Data de publicação | 2002-09-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Não |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Medical Care (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 0025-7079 • E-ISSN: 1537-1948 |
| Editora | Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1097/00005650-200209001-00005 |
| OpenAlex | W4241099528 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Referências citadas | 44 |
Background. With publication of The Belmont Report concerning ethical principles, informed consent gained explicit guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research. However, there is still little evidence about how well informed consent works to assist patients to reach informed decisions about research participation. Objective. To review behavioral decision theory and research to identify implications for informed consent. Research Design. Traditional literature review and hand search of literature were used. Results. Psychological research on biases and heuristics identifies cognitive biases in information processing (selection and interpretation of risks and benefits) that have implications for improving the informing process. A growing literature on patient decision aids provides evidence for the feasibility of more fully informing patients, and includes examples of "debiasing" procedures (to improve information comprehension and consent). Conclusions. Informing and consenting involve conceptually different challenges concerning effectiveness versus values. Debiasing techniques need to be developed and empirically tested to determine their effectiveness in informing patients. Consenting involves both social and individual values. Appealing to altruism when summarizing the goals of research may increase research participation and does not necessarily violate voluntariness of informed consent. Additional research is needed to determine when information-processing biases occur problematically in health-related informed consent, and whether appealing to altruism increases research participation
Alternative medicine · Altruism (biology) · Comprehension · Debiasing · Heuristics · Informed consent · Political science · Psychiatry · Research ethics · Voluntariness · Computer Science · Ethics in medical practice · Medicine · Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues · Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare · Psychology · Social Psychology
All Frames Are Not Created Equal
Decision Affect Theory
The Influence of Framing on Risky Decisions
Decision aids for patients facing health treatment or screening decisions
Informed Decision Making in Outpatient Practice
Are humans good intuitive statisticians after all? Rethinking some conclusions from the literature on judgment under uncertainty
On the Elicitation of Preferences for Alternative Therapies
Out of Control
The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice
Rational choice and the structure of the environment.
The Rhetoric of Irrationality
Implementing shared decision‐making in routine practice
Facilitating Participatory Decision-Making
The Influence of Message Framing on Intentions to Perform Health Behaviors
Affect, generalization, and the perception of risk
On being happy and mistaken
How to Make Cognitive Illusions Disappear
How people get into mental health services
Accounting for the effects of accountability
On the Rationality of Decision-Making Studies
Introduction
Beyond Rational Choice
| Velocidade de citação | historical |
|---|---|
| Altamente citado | Não |