Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

First Trimester Initiation of Prenatal Care in the US-Mexico Border Region

Dados Bibliográficos

ID9099088
AutoresJ A Mcdonald (0000-0003-1034-0677, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, autor correspondente), Brittany Argotsinger (Emory University), Octavio Mojarro, Roger Rochat (0000-0001-6641-9291, Emory University), Anup Amatya (0000-0002-8130-5951, New Mexico State University, autor correspondente)
Ano2015
Volume53
Fascículo8
Páginas700-707
Data de publicação2015-08-01
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessNão
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoMedical Care (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 0025-7079 • E-ISSN: 1537-1948
EditoraOvid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1097/mlr.0000000000000385
PMID26125417
OpenAlexW2259474103
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas4
Referências citadas18

OBJECTIVES: To systematically examine prevalence of first trimester prenatal care (FTPNC) in the 44 US counties and 80 Mexican municipios of the binational border region; and to describe disparities between border and nonborder areas within states, border states, and countries. METHODS: We combined 2009 records of singleton live births from the 10 US-Mexico border states (N=1,370,206) into a single file. We included FTPNC; county/municipio, state, and country of maternal residence; and demographic variables common to all records. We computed prevalence of FTPNC for border and nonborder residents by state and country. Using multivariable regression, we computed adjusted prevalence ratios (aPR) for FTPNC in border relative to nonborder residents, states relative to one another, and the US relative to Mexico. RESULTS: In 2009, 68.8% of US-Mexico border mothers and 72.9% of nonborder mothers received FTPNC. After adjustment, nonborder residents had higher prevalence of FTPNC than border residents in Sonora, New Mexico, Arizona, Coahuila, and Chihuahua (aPR=1.09-124). In US states, prevalence was 13%-36% higher in New Mexico, Arizona, and California than Texas. In Mexico, when compared with Coahuila, adjusted prevalence was 12%-20% higher in neighboring states. Between countries, FTPNC prevalence in border counties/municipios was higher in Mexico among women with low parity/low education and in the United States among women with high parity/high education. CONCLUSIONS: In the US and Mexico, women in border counties/municipios receive less timely prenatal care than their nonborder counterparts, but the magnitude of the disparity varies by state. Lack of a consistent, binational approach to birth data collection requires cautious interpretation of findings

Biology · Environmental health · Obstetrics · Pregnancy · Prenatal care · Genetics · Global Maternal and Child Health · Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare · Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum · Medicine

  • Outcome of Neonates Born to Sars-CoV-2-Infected Mothers

    Open Access•Colleen Everett, Yae Kye et al.•Children•2022

  • Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome (NAS) in Southwestern Border States

    Open Access•Khaleel S Hussaini, Luigi F Garcia Saavedra•Maternal and Child Health Journal•2018

  • Impact of a Community Health Worker (CHW) Home Visiting Intervention on Any and Adequate Prenatal Care Among Ethno-Racially Diverse Pregnant Women of the US Southwest

    Open Access•Kelly McCue, Samantha Sabo et al.•Maternal and Child Health Journal•2022

  • First Trimester Prenatal Care Initiation Among Hispanic Women Along the U.S.-Mexico Border

    Open Access•Katherine Selchau, Maricela Babuca et al.•Maternal and Child Health Journal•2017

  • The quest for universal health coverage

    Open Access•Felicia M Knaul, Eduardo González-Pier et al.•The Lancet•2012

  • Inadequate Prenatal Care Utilization and Risks of Infant Mortality and Poor Birth Outcome

    Open Access•Sarah Partridge, Jacques Balayla et al.•American Journal of Perinatology•2012

  • A Modified Poisson Regression Approach to Prospective Studies with Binary Data

    Guangyong Zou•American Journal of Epidemiology•2004

  • The Effect of Passing an “Anti-immigrant” Ballot Proposition on the Use of Prenatal Care by Foreign-Born Mothers in California

    Open Access•Joanne Spetz, Lindsey C Baker et al.•Journal of Immigrant Health•2000

  • A Profile of US-Mexico Border Mobility Among a Stratified Random Sample of Hispanics Living in the El Paso-Juarez Area

    Open Access•Lisa M Lapeyrouse, Osvaldo F Morera et al.•Journal of Immigrant and Minority…•2011

  • Initiation of and Barriers to Prenatal Care Use Among Low-Income Women in San Antonio, Texas

    Open Access•Thankam Sunil, T S Sunil et al.•Maternal and Child Health Journal•2008

  • Disparities in Initiation and Adherence to Prenatal Care

    Open Access•Marlene Bengiamin, Marlene I Bengiamin et al.•Maternal and Child Health Journal•2009

  • Improvements in Prenatal Insurance Coverage and Utilization of Care in California

    Open Access•Diane R Rittenhouse, Paula Braveman et al.•Maternal and Child Health Journal•2003

  • Prenatal care initiation among very low-income women in the aftermath of welfare reform

    Open Access•Deborah Rosenberg, Arden Handler et al.•Maternal and Child Health Journal•2006

  • Evidence for the intra-uterine programming of adiposity in later life

    Open Access•Caroline Fall, Caroline H D Fall•Annals of Human Biology•2011

  • An evaluation of the Kessner Adequacy of Prenatal Care Index and a proposed Adequacy of Prenatal Care Utilization Index

    Milton Kotelchuck•American Journal of Public Health•1994

Obras citantes distintas4
Citações por ano0,44
Intervalo de citações2017 - 2022 (6)
Velocidade de citaçãohistorical
Altamente citadoNão
Tipos de citaçãoNeutras: 3
Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae