Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

A Multicenter Evaluation of the Impact of Sex on Abdominal and Fracture Pain Care

Bibliographic Data

ID9099216
AuthorsAmmar Siddiqui, Ammar Ahmed Siddiqui (0000-0002-8816-6421, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, corresponding author), Laura Belland (Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, corresponding author), Laura Rivera-Reyes (Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, corresponding author), Daniel Handel, Daniel A Handel (Medical University of South Carolina), Kabir Yadav (0000-0002-1092-9935, University of California, Los Angeles), Kennon Heard (0000-0002-8423-1337, University of Colorado Denver), Amanda Eisenberg (Mount Sinai Beth Israel), Ula Hwang (0000-0002-3715-3073, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, corresponding author)
Year2015
Volume53
Issue11
Pages948-953
Publication date2015-11-01
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueMedical Care (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0025-7079 • E-ISSN: 1537-1948
PublisherOvid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1097/mlr.0000000000000430
PMID26465122
OpenAlexW1773567294
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited30

BACKGROUND: Previous studies examining sex-based disparities in emergency department (ED) pain care have been limited to a single pain condition, a single study site, and lack rigorous control for confounders. OBJECTIVE: A multicenter evaluation of the effect of sex on abdominal pain (AP) and fracture pain (FP) care outcomes. RESEARCH DESIGN: A retrospective cohort review of ED visits at 5 US hospitals in January, April, July, and October 2009. SUBJECTS: A total of 6931 patients with a final ED diagnosis of FP (n=1682) or AP (n=5249) were included. MEASURES: The primary predictor was sex. The primary outcome was time to analgesic administration. Secondary outcomes included time to medication order, and the likelihood of receiving an analgesic and change in pain scores 360 minutes after triage: Multivariable models, clustered by study site, were conducted to adjust for race, age, comorbidities, initial pain score, ED crowding, and triage acuity. RESULTS: On adjusted analyses, compared with men, women with AP waited longer for analgesic administration [AP women: 112 (65-187) minutes, men: 96 (52-167) minutes, P<0.001] and ordering [women: 84 (41-160) minutes, men: 71 (32-137) minutes, P<0.001], whereas women with FP did not (Administration: P=0.360; Order: P=0.133). Compared with men, women with AP were less likely to receive analgesics in the first 90 minutes (OR=0.766; 95% CI, 0.670-0.875; P<0.001), whereas women with FP were not (P=0.357). DISCUSSION: In this multicenter study, we found that women experienced delays in analgesic administration for AP, but not for FP. Future research and interventions to decrease sex disparities in pain care should take type of pain into account

Abdominal pain · Analgesic · Anesthesia · Confounding · Emergency department · Generalized estimating equation · Physical therapy · Triage · Emergency Medicine · Internal Medicine · Medicine · Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation · Opioid Use Disorder Treatment · Pediatric Pain Management Techniques

  • On the contextuality of gender biases in pain care

    Open Access•Sónia F Bernarde, Sónia F Bernardes et al.•Health Psychology Review•2026

Citations per year1
Citation span2026 - 2026 (1)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae