Quality Measurement and System Change of Cancer Care Delivery
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 9099308 |
|---|---|
| Autores | David A Haggstrom (0000-0003-3637-6950, Regenstrief Institute, autor de correspondencia), Bradley N Doebbeling (0000-0003-3504-3468, Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis, autor de correspondencia) |
| Año | 2011 |
| Volumen | 49 |
| Páginas | S21-S27 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2011-12-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | No |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Medical Care (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0025-7079 • E-ISSN: 1537-1948 |
| Editorial | Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1097/mlr.0b013e3181d59529 |
| PMID | 20940654 |
| OpenAlex | W1995629522 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Referencias citadas | 39 |
Cancer care quality measurement and system change may serve as a case example for larger possibilities in the health care system related to other diseases. Cancer care quality gaps and variation exist across both technical and patient-centered cancer quality measures, especially among vulnerable populations. There is a need to develop measures that address the following dimensions of quality and its context: disparities, overuse, patient-centeredness, and uncertainty. Developments that may promote system change in cancer care delivery include changes in the information market, organizational accountability, and consumer empowerment. Information market changes include public cancer care quality reporting, enabled by health information exchange, and incentivized by pay-for-performance. Moving organizational accountability, reimbursement, and quality measurement from individual episodes of care to multiple providers providing coordinated cancer care may address quality gaps associated with the fragmentation of care delivery. Consumer empowerment through new technologies, such as personal health records, may lead to the collection of patient-centered quality measures and promote patient self-management. Across all of these developments, leadership and ongoing research to guide informed system changes will be necessary to transform the cancer care delivery system
Accountability · Business · Context (archaeology) · Economic growth · Economics · Empowerment · Health care · Political science · Quality (philosophy) · Quality management · Reimbursement · Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer · Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life · Marketing · Medicine · Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
Information Needs and Decisional Preferences in Women With Breast Cancer
Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions
The Quality of Health Care Delivered to Adults in the United States
Racial and Ethnic Disparities in the Receipt of Cancer Treatment
Disseminating Innovations in Health Care
Does the patient‐held record improve continuity and related outcomes in cancer care
Connections Between Quality Measurement and Improvement
Implementing Colorectal Cancer Screening in Community Health Centers
Veterans’ Access to and Use of Medicare and Veterans Affairs Health Care
| Velocidad de citación | historical |
|---|---|
| Altamente citado | No |