Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Comparing Retail Clinics With Other Sites of Care

A Systematic Review of Cost, Quality, and Patient Satisfaction

Bibliographic Data

ID9099545
AuthorsTimothy Hoff (0000-0001-8281-5200, Northeastern University, corresponding author), Kathryn Prout (Northeastern University)
Year2019
Volume57
Issue9
Pages734-741
Publication date2019-09-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueMedical Care (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0025-7079 • E-ISSN: 1537-1948
PublisherOvid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1097/mlr.0000000000001164
PMID31274781
OpenAlexW2955449812
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited13

BACKGROUND: Retail clinics, also referred to as walk-in or convenient care clinics, share common features such as a limited menu of primary care services, on-demand patient appointments, greater use of nonphysician providers such as nurse practitioners, and more convenient hours and access points for patients. OBJECTIVES: Given their rising popularity as an alternative primary care delivery site, it is important to examine retail clinics' impact on patient outcomes. This study's aim was to systematically review the extant literature on retail clinics in the United States with respect to 3 outcomes of interest: quality, cost, and patient satisfaction. RESEARCH DESIGN: A systematic search of 4 databases was done using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. Studies needed to be empirical, measure care in retail, walk-in, or convenient care clinic, and present quality, cost, and/or satisfaction findings. MEASURES: The majority of studies used commercial, administrative claims databases to procure patient outcome data (n=9). Nine of the 15 studies examined costs, 6 examined quality, and only 1 examined patient satisfaction. RESULTS: Overall, retail clinic care compares favorably with similar care in other settings in terms of lower costs, although the evidence on quality and patient satisfaction is minimal and less conclusive. CONCLUSIONS: Future research on retail clinic care requires more rigorous study designs, richer quality measures, inclusion of the patient experience in outcomes, less reliance on administrative claims data, and greater independence from industry stakeholders with interest in seeing the retail clinic model grow

Business · Extant taxon · Family medicine · MEDLINE · Patient satisfaction · Popularity · Quality (philosophy) · Systematic review · Emergency and Acute Care Studies · Healthcare Operations and Scheduling Optimization · Healthcare Policy and Management · Marketing · Medicine · Nursing · Psychology

  • Health effects of urgent care center entry

    Open Access•Eliane H Barker, Stephen Wu•Economics & Human Biology•2026

  • Outcomes of Age-Friendly Health Systems

    Open Access•Grace Q Armstrong, Heba Aldossary et al.•INQUIRY The Journal of Health…•2025

Unique citing works2
Citations per year2
Citation span2025 - 2026 (2)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 2

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae