Sensitivity of Household Reported Medical Conditions in the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 9099588 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Steven Machlin, Steven R Machlin (Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, autor correspondente), Joel W Cohen (Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality), Joel Cohen, Anne Elixhauser (Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality), Karen Beauregard (Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality), Claudia Steiner (Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality) |
| Ano | 2009 |
| Volume | 47 |
| Fascículo | 6 |
| Páginas | 618-625 |
| Data de publicação | 2009-06-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Não |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Medical Care (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 0025-7079 • E-ISSN: 1537-1948 |
| Editora | Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1097/mlr.0b013e318195fa79 |
| PMID | 19433993 |
| OpenAlex | W2031950852 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 8 |
| Referências citadas | 5 |
INTRODUCTION: Accurate survey data on medical conditions are critical for health care researchers. Although medical condition data are complex and are subject to reporting error, little information exists on the quality of household reported condition data. METHODS: We used pooled data from 4 years (2002-2005) of the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) to estimate the extent to which household respondents may underreport 23 types of medical conditions. The medical expenditure panel survey is a nationally representative annual survey of approximately 15,000 households which collects medical condition information in 2 separate components-the Household Component (HC) and the Medical Provider Component (MPC). We computed sensitivity rates based on linked HC and MPC data under the assumption that if collection of medical conditions from household respondents was complete, then the conditions reported in the MPC would also be reported in the HC. RESULTS: Sensitivity rates ranged from a high of 93.8% to a low of 37.4% and were 75% or higher for 10 of the 23 conditions analyzed. The overall sensitivity rate for the 23 conditions combined was 74%. CONCLUSIONS: Household reports tended to be more accurate for conditions that are highly salient, cause pain, require hospitalization, require ongoing treatment, have specific recognizable treatment, alter lifestyle, and/or affect daily life (eg, pregnancy, diabetes, and kidney stones). In addition, reporting generally was better when conditions are classified in broader categories rather than in more detail
British Household Panel Survey · Data collection · Demographic economics · Economics · Environmental health · Family medicine · Health care · Medical care · Medical Expenditure Panel Survey · Panel survey · Statistics · Survey data collection · Demography · Health disparities and outcomes · Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life · Healthcare Systems and Reforms · Medicine
National Prescription Patterns of Antidepressants in the Treatment of Adults With Major Depression in the US Between 1996 and 2015
The Medical Expenditure Panel Survey
Trends in Racial-Ethnic Disparities in Access to Mental Health Care, 2004–2012
Prevalence of multimorbidity combinations and their association with medical costs and poor health
Factors Associated With Emergency Department Use Among the Rural Elderly
Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Depression Care in Community-Dwelling Elderly in the United States
Ongoing Coverage for Ongoing Care
If We Build It, Who Will Come
| Obras citantes distintas | 8 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 0,47 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2009 - 2022 (14) |
| Velocidade de citação | historical |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 6 |