Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

Sensitivity of Household Reported Medical Conditions in the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey

Dados Bibliográficos

ID9099588
AutoresSteven Machlin, Steven R Machlin (Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, autor correspondente), Joel W Cohen (Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality), Joel Cohen, Anne Elixhauser (Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality), Karen Beauregard (Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality), Claudia Steiner (Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality)
Ano2009
Volume47
Fascículo6
Páginas618-625
Data de publicação2009-06-01
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessNão
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoMedical Care (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 0025-7079 • E-ISSN: 1537-1948
EditoraOvid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1097/mlr.0b013e318195fa79
PMID19433993
OpenAlexW2031950852
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas8
Referências citadas5

INTRODUCTION: Accurate survey data on medical conditions are critical for health care researchers. Although medical condition data are complex and are subject to reporting error, little information exists on the quality of household reported condition data. METHODS: We used pooled data from 4 years (2002-2005) of the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) to estimate the extent to which household respondents may underreport 23 types of medical conditions. The medical expenditure panel survey is a nationally representative annual survey of approximately 15,000 households which collects medical condition information in 2 separate components-the Household Component (HC) and the Medical Provider Component (MPC). We computed sensitivity rates based on linked HC and MPC data under the assumption that if collection of medical conditions from household respondents was complete, then the conditions reported in the MPC would also be reported in the HC. RESULTS: Sensitivity rates ranged from a high of 93.8% to a low of 37.4% and were 75% or higher for 10 of the 23 conditions analyzed. The overall sensitivity rate for the 23 conditions combined was 74%. CONCLUSIONS: Household reports tended to be more accurate for conditions that are highly salient, cause pain, require hospitalization, require ongoing treatment, have specific recognizable treatment, alter lifestyle, and/or affect daily life (eg, pregnancy, diabetes, and kidney stones). In addition, reporting generally was better when conditions are classified in broader categories rather than in more detail

British Household Panel Survey · Data collection · Demographic economics · Economics · Environmental health · Family medicine · Health care · Medical care · Medical Expenditure Panel Survey · Panel survey · Statistics · Survey data collection · Demography · Health disparities and outcomes · Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life · Healthcare Systems and Reforms · Medicine

  • National Prescription Patterns of Antidepressants in the Treatment of Adults With Major Depression in the US Between 1996 and 2015

    Open Access•Yan Luo, Yuki Kataoka et al.•Frontiers in Psychiatry•2020

  • The Medical Expenditure Panel Survey

    Joel W Cohen, Steven B Cohen et al.•Medical Care•2009

  • Trends in Racial-Ethnic Disparities in Access to Mental Health Care, 2004–2012

    Benjamin Lê Cook, Nhi‐ha Trinh et al.•Psychiatric Services•2017

  • Prevalence of multimorbidity combinations and their association with medical costs and poor health

    Open Access•Nicholas K Schiltz•Frontiers in Public Health•2022

  • Factors Associated With Emergency Department Use Among the Rural Elderly

    Open Access•Lin Fan, Manish N Shah et al.•The Journal of Rural Health•2011

  • Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Depression Care in Community-Dwelling Elderly in the United States

    Ayse Akincigil, Ayşe Akıncıgil et al.•American Journal of Public Health•2012

  • Ongoing Coverage for Ongoing Care

    Open Access•Stephen P Gulley, Elizabeth K Rasch et al.•American Journal of Public Health•2011

  • If We Build It, Who Will Come

    Stephen P Gulley, Elizabeth K Rasch et al.•Medical Care•2011

  • Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions

    Open Access•Joseph L Fleiss, Bruce Levin et al.•Statistical methods for rates and…•2003

  • Methodological Issues for Health Care Surveys

    Daniel Kasprzyk, Brenda G Cox et al.•Contemporary Sociology A Journal…•1986

Obras citantes distintas8
Citações por ano0,47
Intervalo de citações2009 - 2022 (14)
Velocidade de citaçãohistorical
Altamente citadoNão
Tipos de citaçãoNeutras: 6
Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae