Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Comparisons of Health Plan Quality

Does the Sampling Strategy Affect the Results

Bibliographic Data

ID9100015
AuthorsLee Goldman (University of California, San Francisco, corresponding author), L Elizabeth Goldman, Arpita Chattopadhyay (0000-0003-1692-9474, San Francisco General Hospital), Andrew B Bindman (0000-0002-6161-0609, San Francisco General Hospital)
Year2008
Volume46
Issue7
Pages752-757
Publication date2008-07-01
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueMedical Care (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0025-7079 • E-ISSN: 1537-1948
PublisherOvid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1097/mlr.0b013e3181789300
PMID18580396
OpenAlexW1996784367
LanguageEN
References cited9

BACKGROUND: Health plan evaluations typically focus on beneficiaries continuously enrolled throughout a calendar year. OBJECTIVE: To examine whether the sampling strategy used in evaluating health plans affects their assessment. RESEARCH DESIGN: We completed a cross-sectional analysis of California Medicaid managed care plans aggregating individual level data by health plan. MEASURES: We calculated the correlation between a health plan's annual age-sex adjusted hospitalization rate for ambulatory care sensitive (ACS) conditions sampling among beneficiaries continuously enrolled throughout the year with all health plan beneficiaries enrolled for a minimum of 1 month. For health plan beneficiaries with a minimum of 1 month of enrollment we calculated hospitalization rates in 2 ways: (1) counting only those ACS hospitalizations while enrolled in the plan and (2) counting any ACS hospitalization throughout the year regardless of whether it was during the period of plan enrollment. SUBJECTS: California Medicaid beneficiaries 18-64 years of age in 2001. RESULTS: Forty-four Medicaid plans representing approximately 750,000 beneficiaries were included. On average, 50% (range, 26-69% across plans) of the beneficiaries were enrolled continuously during the year. Plan rankings based on the ACS hospitalization rates for each of the 3 sampling strategies were variably correlated [Spearman correlations 0.26 (P = 0.086), 0.33 (P = 0.031), and 0.71 (P < 0.0001) for pairwise comparisons]. The agreement among the sampling strategies in labeling a health plan as an outlier was not statistically different than random chance (kappa = 0.069, P = 0.21). CONCLUSIONS: Judgments regarding health plan performance are affected by limiting the evaluation sample to only those beneficiaries continuously enrolled in a health plan throughout the year. Policymakers should consider the goal of health care measurement when selecting a sampling strategy and explicitly acknowledge the bias that might be introduced by a particular approach

Geography · Health care · Health plan · Plan (archaeology) · Political science · Quality (philosophy) · Computer Science · Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes · Healthcare Policy and Management · Primary Care and Health Outcomes

  • Preventable Hospitalizations and Access to Health Care

    Andrew B Bindman•JAMA•1995

  • Accuracy of Medicaid Payer Coding in Hospital Patient Discharge Data

    Arpita Chattopadhyay, Andrew B Bindman•Medical Care•2005

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae