Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Rate of Utilization and Determinants of Withdrawal of Care in Acute Ischemic Stroke Treated With Thrombolytics in USA

Bibliographic Data

ID9100040
AuthorsAdnan I Qureshi (0000-0003-4962-540X, University of Minnesota), Malik M Adil, Malik Adil (0000-0002-4635-6462, University of Minnesota), Muhammed Fareed K Suri, M Fareed Suri (University of Minnesota)
Year2013
Volume51
Issue12
Pages1094-1100
Publication date2013-12-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueMedical Care (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0025-7079 • E-ISSN: 1537-1948
PublisherOvid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1097/mlr.0b013e3182a95db4
PMID24226307
OpenAlexW2034745625
LanguageEN
References cited6

BACKGROUND: Our current practices for utilization of thrombolytics are based on results of clinical trials with no or restricted use of "withdrawal of care" among treated patients. The increasing use of "withdrawal of care" in routine practice may lead to suboptimal outcomes among acute ischemic stroke patients. METHODS: We determined the frequency of "withdrawal of care" and determined demographic and clinical characteristics, and in-hospital outcomes among thrombolytic-treated ischemic stroke patients stratified by use of "withdrawal of care" using National Inpatient Sample data files from 2002 to 2010. RESULTS: "Withdrawal of care" during hospitalization was instituted in 4287 (3.3%) of the 130,437 acute ischemic stroke patients treated with thrombolytics. In the stepwise logistic regression analysis, women [odds ratio (OR) 1.2, 95% confidence interval (CI), (1.0-1.5)], presence of atrial fibrillation [OR 1.2, 95% CI, (1.0-1.5)], hemiplegia/hemiparesis [OR 1.4, 95% CI, (1.1-1.7)], aphasia [OR 1.2, 95% CI, (1.0-1.5)], and postthrombolytic intracerebral hemorrhage (OR 1.5, 95% CI, 1.1-1.8) were significant predictors of "withdrawal of care" among thrombolytic-treated ischemic stroke patient. Hospitals located in the west region [OR 1.7, 95% CI, (1.2-2.4)], and teaching hospitals [OR 1.4, 95% CI, (1.0-1.8)] were more likely to use withdrawal of care. In-hospital mortality (61% vs. 9.0%, P≤0.0001) were higher among those with "withdrawal of care." CONCLUSIONS: Several individual-related and institution-related factors were associated with the use of "withdrawal of care" among thrombolytic-treated ischemic stroke patients. The excessively high mortality and resource utilization mandates a more evidence based policy for "withdrawal of care" in these patients

Acute care · Acute stroke · Cardiology · Health care · Intensive care medicine · Ischemia · Ischemic stroke · Medical emergency · Stroke (engine) · Tissue plasminogen activator · Acute Ischemic Stroke Management · Emergency Medicine · Internal Medicine · Intracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Research · Medicine · Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery

  • Associations Between the Use of Do-Not-Resuscitate Orders and Length of Stay in Patients With Stroke

    Laura B Shepardson, Amy C Justice et al.•Medical Care•1998

  • Changes Over Time in the Use of Do Not Resuscitate Orders and the Outcomes of Patients Receiving Them

    Neil Wenger, Neil S Wenger et al.•Medical Care•1997

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae