Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Association Between Medicare’s Sepsis Reporting Policy (SEP-1) and the Documentation of a Sepsis Diagnosis in the Clinical Record

Bibliographic Data

ID9100269
AuthorsIan J Barbash (0000-0002-9840-0576, Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, corresponding author), Billie S Davis (0000-0002-6342-4244, University of Pittsburgh), Melissa Saul (0000-0002-6712-5102, University of Pittsburgh), Rebecca Hwa (0000-0003-1158-7014, University of Pittsburgh), Emily B Brant (University of Pittsburgh), Emily Brant (0000-0002-0207-8210, University of Pittsburgh), Christopher W Seymour (0000-0002-6257-6764, University of Pittsburgh), Jeremy M Kahn (0000-0001-9688-5576, Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, corresponding author)
Year2024
Volume62
Issue6
Pages388-395
Publication date2024-06-01
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueMedical Care (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0025-7079 • E-ISSN: 1537-1948
PublisherOvid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1097/mlr.0000000000001997
PMID38620117
OpenAlexW4394822628
LanguageEN
References cited22

STUDY DESIGN: Interrupted time series analysis of a retrospective, electronic health record cohort. OBJECTIVE: To determine the association between the implementation of Medicare's sepsis reporting measure (SEP-1) and sepsis diagnosis rates as assessed in clinical documentation. BACKGROUND: The role of health policy in the effort to improve sepsis diagnosis remains unclear. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Adult patients hospitalized with suspected infection and organ dysfunction within 6 hours of presentation to the emergency department, admitted to one of 11 hospitals in a multi-hospital health system from January 2013 to December 2017. Clinician-diagnosed sepsis, as reflected by the inclusion of the terms "sepsis" or "septic" in the text of clinical notes in the first two calendar days following presentation. RESULTS: Among 44,074 adult patients with sepsis admitted to 11 hospitals over 5 years, the proportion with sepsis documentation was 32.2% just before the implementation of SEP-1 in the third quarter of 2015 and increased to 37.3% by the fourth quarter of 2017. Of the 9 post-SEP-1 quarters, 8 had odds ratios for a sepsis diagnosis >1 (overall range: 0.98-1.26; P value for a joint test of statistical significance = 0.005). The effects were clinically modest, with a maximum effect of an absolute increase of 4.2% (95% CI: 0.9-7.8) at the end of the study period. The effect was greater in patients who did not require vasopressors compared with patients who required vasopressors ( P value for test of interaction = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: SEP-1 implementation was associated with modest increases in sepsis diagnosis rates, primarily among patients who did not require vasoactive medications

Cohort · Cohort study · Diagnosis code · Emergency department · Intensive care medicine · Odds ratio · Organ dysfunction · Population · Presentation (obstetrics) · Retrospective cohort study · Sepsis · Emergency Medicine · Internal Medicine · Medicine · Neonatal and Maternal Infections · Nosocomial Infections in ICU · Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment · Surgery

  • The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3)

    Mervyn Singer, Clifford S Deutschman et al.•JAMA•2016

  • Comorbidity Measures for Use with Administrative Data

    Anne Elixhauser, Claudia Steiner et al.•Medical Care•1998

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae