Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

Hospital Length of Stay Prediction Methods

A Systematic Review

Dados Bibliográficos

ID9100743
AutoresVincent Lequertier (0000-0001-7904-1961, Research on Healthcare Performance (RESHAPE), Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, INSERM U1290, autor correspondente), Tao Wang (0000-0002-8367-8946, University of Lyon, INSA Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Univ Lumière Lyon 2, UJM-Saint-Etienne, Decision and Information Systems for Production systems (DISP), Villeurbanne Cedex), Julien Fondrevelle (0000-0002-8505-0212, Univ Lyon, INSA Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Univ Lumière Lyon 2, DISP, EA4570, 69621 Villeurbanne, France), Vincent Augusto (0000-0002-5063-0831, Mines Saint-Etienne, University of Clermont Auvergne, CNRS, UMR 6158 LIMOS, Centre CIS, Saint-Etienne, France), Antoine Duclos (0000-0002-8915-4203, Research on Healthcare Performance (RESHAPE), Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, INSERM U1290, autor correspondente)
Ano2021
Volume59
Fascículo10
Páginas929-938
Data de publicação2021-10-01
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessNão
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoMedical Care (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 0025-7079 • E-ISSN: 1537-1948
EditoraOvid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1097/mlr.0000000000001596
PMID34310455
OpenAlexW3186283777
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas1
Referências citadas82

OBJECTIVE: This systematic review sought to establish a picture of length of stay (LOS) prediction methods based on available hospital data and study protocols designed to measure their performance. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An English literature search was done relative to hospital LOS prediction from 1972 to September 2019 according to the PRISMA guidelines. Articles were retrieved from PubMed, ScienceDirect, and arXiv databases. Information were extracted from the included papers according to a standardized assessment of population setting and study sample, data sources and input variables, LOS prediction methods, validation study design, and performance evaluation metrics. RESULTS: Among 74 selected articles, 98.6% (73/74) used patients' data to predict LOS; 27.0% (20/74) used temporal data; and 21.6% (16/74) used the data about hospitals. Overall, regressions were the most popular prediction methods (64.9%, 48/74), followed by machine learning (20.3%, 15/74) and deep learning (17.6%, 13/74). Regarding validation design, 35.1% (26/74) did not use a test set, whereas 47.3% (35/74) used a separate test set, and 17.6% (13/74) used cross-validation. The most used performance metrics were R2 (47.3%, 35/74), mean squared (or absolute) error (24.4%, 18/74), and the accuracy (14.9%, 11/74). Over the last decade, machine learning and deep learning methods became more popular (P=0.016), and test sets and cross-validation got more and more used (P=0.014). CONCLUSIONS: Methods to predict LOS are more and more elaborate and the assessment of their validity is increasingly rigorous. Reducing heterogeneity in how these methods are used and reported is key to transparency on their performance

Data mining · Data set · Machine learning · Mean squared error · Predictive modelling · Sample size determination · Statistics · Test (biology) · Test set · Artificial Intelligence · Computer Science · Frailty in Older Adults · Heart Failure Treatment and Management · Mathematics · Medicine · Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment

  • Length of Stay Prediction With Standardized Hospital Data From Acute and Emergency Care Using a Deep Neural Network

    Vincent Lequertier, Tao Wang et al.•Medical Care•2024

  • Artificial intelligence in healthcare

    Open Access•Kun-Hsing Yu, Andrew L Beam et al.•Nature Biomedical Engineering•2018

  • Cross-Validatory Choice and Assessment of Statistical Predictions

    Open Access•M Stone•Journal of the Royal Statistical…•1974

  • ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks

    Open Access•Alex Krizhevsky, Ilya Sutskever et al.•Communications of the ACM•2017

  • Matplotlib

    Open Access•John D Hunter•Computing in Science & Engineering•2007

  • The potential for artificial intelligence in healthcare

    Open Access•Thomas H Davenport, Thomas Davenport et al.•Future Healthcare Journal•2019

  • Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses

    Open Access•David Moher, Alessandro Liberati et al.•PLoS Medicine•2009

  • Systematic Review of Risk Adjustment Models of Hospital Length of Stay (LOS)

    Mingshan Lu, Tolulope Sajobi et al.•Medical Care•2015

  • Improving the homogeneity of diagnosis-related groups (DRGs) by using clinical laboratory, demographic, and discharge data

    E S Goldman, M J Easterling et al.•American Journal of Public Health•1989

  • Hospital Workload and Adverse Events

    Joel S Weissman, Jeffrey M Rothschild et al.•Medical Care•2007

  • Length of Stay Predictions

    Vincent Liu, Patricia Kipnis et al.•Medical Care•2010

  • The Use of Length of Stay Distributions to Predict Hospital Discharges

    Paul A Fuhs, James B Martin et al.•Medical Care•1979

  • Can Pharmacy Data Improve Prediction of Hospital Outcomes

    Joseph P Parker, Jeffrey S McCombs et al.•Medical Care•2003

  • The Effects of Patient, Hospital, and Physician Characteristics on Length of Stay and Mortality

    Lawton R Burns, Douglas R Wholey•Medical Care•1991

  • The Relationship Between Severity of Illness and Hospital Length of Stay and Mortality

    Susan D Horn, Phoebe D Sharkey et al.•Medical Care•1991

Obras citantes distintas1
Citações por ano0,5
Intervalo de citações2024 - 2024 (1)
Velocidade de citaçãorecent
Altamente citadoNão
Tipos de citaçãoNeutras: 1
Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae