Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Recent Improvements in Bariatric Surgery Outcomes

Bibliographic Data

ID9100770
AuthorsWilliam Encinosa (0000-0002-1970-5620, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, corresponding author), William E Encinosa, Didem Bernard (Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality), Didem M Bernard, Dongyi Du (University of Maryland, Baltimore), Claudia Steiner (Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, corresponding author), Claudia A Steiner
Year2009
Volume47
Issue5
Pages531-535
Publication date2009-05-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueMedical Care (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0025-7079 • E-ISSN: 1537-1948
PublisherOvid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1097/mlr.0b013e31819434c6
PMID19318997
OpenAlexW2080193565
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited7

OBJECTIVE: Bariatric surgery is one of the fastest growing hospital procedures, but with a 40% complication rate in 2001. Between 2001 and 2005 bariatric surgeries grew by 113%. Our objective is to examine how 6-month complications improved between 2001 and 2006, using a nationwide, population-based sample. DATA/DESIGN: We examined insurance claims in 2001-2002 and 2005-2006 for 9582 bariatric surgeries, at 652 hospitals, among a population of 16 million non-elderly people. Outcomes and costs were risk-adjusted using multivariate regression methods with hospital fixed effects. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Between 2001 and 2006, while older and sicker patients underwent the surgery, the 180-day risk-adjusted complication rate declined 21% from 41.7% to 32.8%. Most of the improvement was in the initial hospital stay, where the risk-adjusted inpatient complication rate declined 37%, from 23.6% to 14.8%. Risk-adjusted rates of readmissions with complications declined 31%, from 9.8% to 6.8%. Risk-adjusted hospital days declined from 6 to 3.7 days, and risk-adjusted and inflation-adjusted payments declined 6%.Improvements in complication rates and readmission rates were associated with a within-hospital 30% increase in hospital volume. Volume had no impact on costs. The use of laparoscopy, which increased from 9% to 71%, reduced costs by 12%, while gastric banding decreased costs by 20%. Laparoscopy had no impact on readmissions, but the increase in banding without bypass reduced readmissions. CONCLUSIONS: Improvements in bariatric outcomes and costs were due to a mix of within-hospital volume increases, a move to a laparoscopic technique, and an increase in banding without bypass

Complication · Environmental health · General surgery · Laparoscopy · Population · Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes · Body Contouring and Surgery · Emergency Medicine · Medicine · Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques · Surgery

  • Health Care Utilization and Expenditure Changes Associated With Bariatric Surgery

    Matthew L Maciejewski, Valerie A Smith et al.•Medical Care•2010

  • The medicalization of obesity, bariatric surgery, and population health

    Open Access•Selena E Ortiz, Ichiro Kawachi et al.•Health An Interdisciplinary…•2017

  • Smearing Estimate

    Naihua Duan•Journal of the American…•1983

  • Bariatric Surgery

    Henry Buchwald, Yoav Avidor et al.•JAMA•2004

  • Healthcare Utilization and Outcomes After Bariatric Surgery

    William Encinosa, William E Encinosa et al.•Medical Care•2006

Unique citing works2
Citations per year0.13
Citation span2010 - 2017 (8)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 2

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae