Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

How to Identify Team-based Primary Care in the United States Using Medicare Data

Bibliographic Data

ID9101039
AuthorsYong-Fang Kuo (0000-0003-1927-0927, Internal Medicine and Sealy Center on Aging, corresponding author), Yu-Li Lin (0000-0003-4721-9387, Preventive Medicine and Population Health), Daniel C Jupiter (0000-0002-3235-0473, General Department of Preventive Medicine), Daniel Jupiter (Preventive Medicine and Population Health)
Year2021
Volume59
Issue2
Pages118-122
Publication date2021-02-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueMedical Care (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0025-7079 • E-ISSN: 1537-1948
PublisherOvid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1097/mlr.0000000000001478
PMID33273297
OpenAlexW3106925439
LanguageEN
References cited7

BACKGROUND: Studying team-based primary care using 100% national outpatient Medicare data is not feasible, due to limitations in the availability of this dataset to researchers. METHODS: We assessed whether analyses using different sets of Medicare data can produce results similar to those from analyses using 100% data from an entire state, in identifying primary care teams through social network analysis. First, we used data from 100% Medicare beneficiaries, restricted to those within a primary care services area (PCSA), to identify primary care teams. Second, we used data from a 20% sample of Medicare beneficiaries and defined shared care by 2 providers using 2 different cutoffs for the minimum required number of shared patients, to identify primary care teams. RESULTS: The team practices identified with social network analysis using the 20% sample and a cutoff of 6 patients shared between 2 primary care providers had good agreement with team practices identified using statewide data (F measure: 90.9%). Use of 100% data within a small area geographic boundary, such as PCSAs, had an F measure of 83.4%. The percent of practices identified from these datasets that coincided with practices identified from statewide data were 86% versus 100%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Depending on specific study purposes, researchers could use either 100% data from Medicare beneficiaries in randomly selected PCSAs, or data from a 20% national sample of Medicare beneficiaries to study team-based primary care in the United States

Family medicine · MEDLINE · Political science · Primary care · Chronic Disease Management Strategies · Healthcare Systems and Technology · Medicine · Primary Care and Health Outcomes

  • Resolution limit in community detection

    Open Access•Santo Fortunato, Marc Barthélemy•Proceedings of the National…•2007

  • A Comparative Analysis of Community Detection Algorithms on Artificial Networks

    Open Access•Zhao Yang, René Algesheimer et al.•Scientific Reports•2016

  • Modularity and community structure in networks

    Open Access•M E J Newman•Proceedings of the National…•2006

  • Use of Medicare Data to Identify Team-based Primary Care

    Yong-Fang Kuo, Mukaila A Raji et al.•Medical Care•2019

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae