Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Impact of Different Measures of Comorbid Disease on Predicted Mortality of Intensive Care Unit Patients

Bibliographic Data

ID9101127
AuthorsJoseph A Johnston (0000-0003-3913-9256, Veterans Health Administration, corresponding author), Douglas P Wagner, Stephen Timmon (0000-0002-3731-1350, corresponding author), Stephen Timmons, Deborah Welsh, Deborah E Welsh, Joel Tsevat (0000-0002-0413-8969, corresponding author), Marta L Render (corresponding author)
Year2002
Volume40
Issue10
Pages929-940
Publication date2002-10-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueMedical Care (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0025-7079 • E-ISSN: 1537-1948
PublisherOvid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1097/00005650-200210000-00010
PMID12395026
OpenAlexW2046461196
LanguageEN
Citations received5
References cited16

BACKGROUND: Valid comparison of patient survival across ICUs requires adjustment for burden of chronic illness. The optimal measure of comorbidity in this setting remains uncertain. OBJECTIVES: To examine the impact of different measures of comorbid disease on predicted mortality for ICU patients. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SUBJECTS: Seventeen thousand eight hundred ninety-three veterans from 17 geographically diverse VA Medical Centers and 43 ICUs were studied, admitted between February 1, 1996 and July 31, 1997. MEASURES: ICD-9-CM codes reflecting comorbid disease from hospital stays before and including the index hospitalization from local VA computer databases were extracted, and three measures of comorbid disease were then compared: (1) an APACHE-weighted comorbidity score using comorbid diseases used in APACHE, (2) a count of conditions described by Elixhauser, and (3) Elixhauser comorbid diseases weighted independently. Univariate analyses and multivariate logistic regression models were used to determine the contribution of each measure to in-hospital mortality predictions. RESULTS: Models using independently weighted Elixhauser comorbidities discriminated better than models using an APACHE-weighted score or a count of Elixhauser comorbidities. Twenty-three and 14 of the Elixhauser conditions were significant univariate and multivariable predictors of in-hospital mortality, respectively. In a multivariable model including all available predictors, comorbidity accounted for less (8.4%) of the model's uniquely attributable chi statistic than laboratory values (67.7%) and diagnosis (17.7%), but more than age (4.0%) and admission source (2.1%). Excluding codes from prior hospitalizations did not adversely affect model performance. CONCLUSIONS: Independently weighted comorbid conditions identified through computerized discharge abstracts can contribute significantly to ICU risk adjustment models

Comorbidity · Disease · Intensive care unit · Logistic regression · Multivariate analysis · Multivariate statistics · Retrospective cohort study · Severity of illness · Statistic · Statistics · Univariate · Univariate analysis · Chronic Disease Management Strategies · Emergency and Acute Care Studies · Emergency Medicine · Internal Medicine · Medicine · Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment

  • Comparison of Elixhauser and Charlson Methods for Discriminative Performance in Mortality Risk in Patients with Schizophrenic Disorders

    Open Access•Kuan‐yi Tsai, Kuan-Yi Tsai et al.•International Journal of…•2020

  • Systematic Review of Comorbidity Indices for Administrative Data

    Mansour T A Sharabiani, Paul Aylin et al.•Medical Care•2012

  • Socioeconomic Status and Outcome From Intensive Care in England and Wales

    Andrew Hutchings, Rosalind Raine et al.•Medical Care•2004

  • Should We Add Clinical Variables to Administrative Data

    Trisha C Johnston, Trisha Johnston et al.•Medical Care•2007

  • A Modification of the Elixhauser Comorbidity Measures Into a Point System for Hospital Death Using Administrative Data

    Carl van Walraven, Peter C Austin et al.•Medical Care•2009

  • Apache Ii

    William A Knaus, Elizabeth A Draper et al.•Critical Care Medicine•1985

  • Presentation adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative data

    Open Access•Patrick S Romano, L L Roos et al.•Journal of Clinical Epidemiology•1993

  • A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases.

    J A Hanley, Barbara J Mcneil•Radiology•1983

  • Comorbidity Measures for Use with Administrative Data

    Anne Elixhauser, Claudia Steiner et al.•Medical Care•1998

  • Bias in the Coding of Hospital Discharge Data and Its Implications for Quality Assessment

    Patrick S Romano, David Mark et al.•Medical Care•1994

  • Comparison of the Performance of Two Comorbidity Measures, With and Without Information From Prior Hospitalizations

    George J Stukenborg, Douglas P Wagner et al.•Medical Care•2001

Unique citing works5
Citations per year0,23
Citation span2004 - 2020 (17)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 5

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae