Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Identifying Research Gaps and Prioritizing Psychological Health Evidence Synthesis Needs

Bibliographic Data

ID9101310
AuthorsSusanne Hempel (0000-0003-1597-5110, RAND Corporation, Evidence-based Practice Center (EPC), Santa Monica, corresponding author), Kristie Gore (RAND, National Security Research Division, Arlington), Kristie L Gore, Bradley E Belsher (0000-0003-2243-1170, Defense Health Agency), Bradley Belsher (Defense Health Agency, Psychological Health Center of Excellence (PHCoE), Falls Church, VA)
Year2019
Volume57
IssueSuppl 3
PagesS259-S264
Publication date2019-10-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueMedical Care (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0025-7079 • E-ISSN: 1537-1948
PublisherOvid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1097/mlr.0000000000001175
PMID31517797
OpenAlexW2972932236
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited17

BACKGROUND: Evidence synthesis is key in promoting evidence-based health care, but it is resource-intense. Methods are needed to identify and prioritize evidence synthesis needs within health care systems. We describe a collaboration between an agency charged with facilitating the implementation of evidence-based research and practices across the Military Health System and a research center specializing in evidence synthesis. METHODS: Scoping searches targeted 15 sources, including the Veterans Affairs/Department of Defense Guidelines and National Defense Authorization Acts. We screened for evidence gaps in psychological health management approaches relevant to the target population. We translated gaps into potential topics for evidence maps and/or systematic reviews. Gaps amenable to evidence synthesis format provided the basis for stakeholder input. Stakeholders rated topics for their potential to inform psychological health care in the military health system. Feasibility scans determined whether topics were ready to be pursued, that is, sufficient literature exists, and duplicative efforts are avoided. RESULTS: We identified 58 intervention, 9 diagnostics, 12 outcome, 19 population, and 24 health services evidence synthesis gaps. Areas included: posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) (19), suicide prevention (14), depression (9), bipolar disorder (9), substance use (24), traumatic brain injury (20), anxiety (1), and cross-cutting (14) synthesis topics. Stakeholder input helped prioritize 19 potential PTSD topics and 22 other psychological health topics. To date, 46 topics have undergone feasibility scans. We document lessons learned across clinical topics and research methods. CONCLUSION: We describe a transparent and structured approach to evidence synthesis topic selection for a health care system using scoping searches, translation into evidence synthesis format, stakeholder input, and feasibility scans

MEDLINE · Political science · Health Policy Implementation Science · Health Sciences Research and Education · Meta-analysis and systematic reviews · Psychology

  • Extensive Reading as a Gateway to Create Research Gap

    Open Access•Fahrus Zaman Fadhly•Indonesian Journal of EFL and…•2022

  • Establishing an Evidence Synthesis Capability For Psychological Health Topics in the Military Health System

    Bradley E Belsher, Erin H Beech et al.•Medical Care•2019

  • Closing the gap between research and practice

    Open Access•Lisa A Bero, Lisa Bero et al.•BMJ•1998

  • Expediting systematic reviews

    Open Access•Rebecca Ganann, Donna Ciliska et al.•Implementation Science•2010

  • The Mass Production of Redundant, Misleading, and Conflicted Systematic Reviews and Meta‐analyses

    Open Access•John P A Ioannidis•Milbank Quarterly•2016

  • The answer is 17 years, what is the question

    Open Access•Zoë Slote Morris, Steven Wooding et al.•Proceedings of the Royal Society…•2011

Unique citing works2
Citations per year0,29
Citation span2019 - 2022 (4)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 1

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae