Response to Hays et al and McHorney and Cohen
A Discussion of Item Response Theory and Its Applications in Health Status Assessment
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 9101630 |
|---|---|
| Authors | David Cella (0000-0002-9881-4541, NorthShore University HealthSystem, corresponding author), Chih‐Hung Chang (0000-0002-7910-4704, Northwestern University), Chih-Hung Chang |
| Year | 2000 |
| Volume | 38 |
| Issue | 9 Suppl |
| Pages | II-66-II-72 |
| Publication date | 2000-09-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Medical Care (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0025-7079 • E-ISSN: 1537-1948 |
| Publisher | Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1097/00005650-200009002-00010 |
| PMID | 10982091 |
| OpenAlex | W206029000 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 22 |
| References cited | 11 |
From the Center on Outcomes Research and Education (CORE), Evanston Northwestern Healthcare; the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, Northwestern University Medical School; and the Institute for Health Services Research and Policy Studies, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois. †From the Center on Outcomes Research and Education (CORE), Evanston Northwestern Healthcare and the Institute for Health Services Research and Policy Studies, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois. Supported in part by DHHS NIH grant R01 CA60068. Address correspondence and reprint requests to: David Cella, PhD, Center on Outcomes Research and Education (CORE), Evanston Northwestern Healthcare, 1000 Central St, Suite 101, Evanston, IL 60201. E-Mail: [email protected]
Center (category theory) · Health care · Library science · Medical education · Political science · Research center · Computer Science · Grit, Self-Efficacy, and Motivation · Law · Medicine · Psychology · Psychometric Methodologies and Testing · Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
Psychometric evaluation of the WHOQOL-BREF in community-dwelling older people in Taiwan using Rasch analysis
The psychosocial impact of cancer
The future of outcomes measurement
Measuring social health in the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS)
Operacionalização de adaptação transcultural de instrumentos de aferição usados em epidemiologia
Comparability of Interview- and Self-Administration of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (Fact-G) in English- and Spanish-Speaking Ambulatory Cancer Patients
The impact of literacy on health-related quality of life measurement and outcomes in cancer outpatients
Patient-Reported Outcome Measures and Risk Factors in a Quality Registry
Development of a Computer-adaptive Test for Depression (D-CAT)
Development and evaluation of a computer adaptive test for ‘Anxiety’ (Anxiety-CAT)
Next steps for use of item response theory in the assessment of health outcomes
Comparison of health-related quality of life questionnaires in ambulatory oncology
Computerized Adaptive Testing—Ready for Ambulatory Monitoring
Advancing Health Disparities Research
Response to Hays et al and McHorney and Cohen
Health Outcomes Methodology Symposium
Literacy-Fair Measurement of Health-Related Quality of Life Will Facilitate Comparative Effectiveness Research in Spanish-Speaking Cancer Outpatients
Controversy and the Rasch Model
A Taxonomy of the Uses of Health-Related Quality-of-Life Instruments in Cancer Care and the Clinical Meaningfulness of the Results
Response to Hays et al and McHorney and Cohen
Measuring Disability in Medicare Home Care Patients
Item Banks and Their Potential Applications to Health Status Assessment in Diverse Populations
Statistical Theories of Mental Test Scores
Full-Information Item Factor Analysis
A Rasch Model for Partial Credit Scoring
A Generalized Partial Credit Model
A rating formulation for ordered response categories
Estimating item parameters and latent ability when responses are scored in two or more nominal categories
Equating Health Status Measures With Item Response Theory
Item Response Theory and Health Outcomes Measurement in the 21st Century
| Unique citing works | 22 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,85 |
| Citation span | 2000 - 2014 (15) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 16 |