Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

An Electronic Health Record–based Algorithm to Ascertain the Date of Second Breast Cancer Events

Bibliographic Data

ID9101632
AuthorsJessica Chubak (0000-0003-1630-9021, Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, corresponding author), Tracy Onega (0000-0002-1633-3040, Department of Community and Family Medicine, The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, and Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, NH), Weiwei Zhu (0000-0003-1852-8877, Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, corresponding author), Diana S M Buist (0000-0001-5408-2804, Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, corresponding author), Rebecca A Hubbard (0000-0003-0879-0994, University of Pennsylvania)
Year2017
Volume55
Issue12
Pagese81-e87
Publication date2017-12-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueMedical Care (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0025-7079 • E-ISSN: 1537-1948
PublisherOvid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1097/mlr.0000000000000352
PMID25856568
OpenAlexW2324226497
LanguageEN
References cited7

OBJECTIVES: Studies of cancer recurrences and second primary tumors require information on outcome dates. Little is known about how well electronic health record-based algorithms can identify dates or how errors in dates can bias analyses. RESEARCH DESIGN: We assessed rule-based and model-fitting approaches to assign event dates using a previously published electronic health record-based algorithm for second breast cancer events (SBCE). We conducted a simulation study to assess bias due to date assignment errors in time-to-event analyses. SUBJECTS: From a cohort of 3152 early-stage breast cancer patients, 358 women accurately identified as having had an SBCE served as the basis for this analysis. MEASURES: Percent of predicted SBCE dates identified within ±60 days of the true date was the primary measure of accuracy. In the simulation study, bias in hazard ratios (HRs) was estimated by averaging the difference between HRs based on algorithm-assigned dates and the true HR across 1000 simulations each with simulated N=4000. RESULTS: The most accurate date algorithm had a median difference between the true and predicted dates of 0 days with 82% of predicted dates falling within 60 days of the true date. Bias resulted when algorithm sensitivity and specificity varied by exposure status, but was minimal when date assignment errors were of the magnitude observed for our date assignment method. CONCLUSIONS: SBCE date can be relatively accurately assigned based on a previous algorithm. While acceptable in many scenarios, algorithm-assigned dates are not appropriate to use when operating characteristics are likely to vary by the study exposure

Algorithm · Breast cancer · Cancer · Confidence interval · Data mining · Electronic health record · Event (particle physics) · Hazard ratio · Health care · Statistics · Breast Cancer Treatment Studies · Cancer Risks and Factors · Computer Science · Global Cancer Incidence and Screening · Internal Medicine · Mathematics · Medicine

  • Validating Billing/Encounter Codes as Indicators of Lung, Colorectal, Breast, and Prostate Cancer Recurrence Using 2 Large Contemporary Cohorts

    Michael J Hassett, Debra P Ritzwoller et al.•Medical Care•2014

  • Identifying Cancer Relapse Using Seer-Medicare Data

    Craig C Earle, Ann B Nattinger et al.•Medical Care•2002

  • Sensitivity of Medicare Claims to Identify Cancer Recurrence in Elderly Colorectal and Breast Cancer Patients

    Joan L Warren, Ângela Mariotto et al.•Medical Care•2016

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae