Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The Influence of Health Care Policies and Health Care System Distrust on Willingness to Undergo Genetic Testing

Bibliographic Data

ID9101708
AuthorsKatrina Armstrong (0000-0001-5781-5970, University of Pennsylvania, corresponding author), Mary Putt (Cancer Research And Biostatistics, corresponding author), Chanita Hughes Halbert (0000-0002-0103-6916, Abramson Cancer Center), David Grande (0000-0002-6717-6735, corresponding author), Jerome Sanford Schwartz, Kaijun Liao (corresponding author), Noora Marcus (0000-0002-9232-5333, corresponding author), Mirar Bristol Demeter (corresponding author), Judy A Shea (0000-0002-7334-4192, corresponding author), JUDY SHEA
Year2012
Volume50
Issue5
Pages381-387
Publication date2012-05-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueMedical Care (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0025-7079 • E-ISSN: 1537-1948
PublisherOvid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1097/mlr.0b013e31824d748b
PMID22473221
PMCIDPMC3360826
OpenAlexW2040346664
LanguageEN
Citations received6
References cited35

PURPOSE: As the potential role of genetic testing in disease prevention and management grows, so does concern about differences in uptake of genetic testing across social and racial groups. Characteristics of how genetic tests are delivered may influence willingness to undergo testing and, if they affect population subgroups differently, alter disparities in testing. METHODS: Conjoint analysis study of the effect of 3 characteristics of genetic test delivery (ie, attributes) on willingness to undergo genetic testing for cancer risk. Data were collected using a random digit dialing survey of 128 African American and 209 white individuals living in the United States. Measures included conjoint scenarios, the Revised Health Care System Distrust Scale (including the values and competence subscales), health insurance coverage, and sociodemographic characteristics. The 3 attributes studied were disclosure of test results to the health insurer, provision of the test by a specialist or primary care doctor, and race-specific or race-neutral marketing. RESULTS: In adjusted analyses, disclosure of test results to insurers, having to get the test from a specialist, and race-specific marketing were all inversely associated with willingness to undergo the genetic test, with the greatest effect for the disclosure attribute. Racial differences in willingness to undergo testing were not statistically significant (P=0.07) and the effect of the attributes on willingness to undergo testing did not vary by patient race. However, the decrease in willingness to undergo testing with insurance disclosure was greater among individuals with high values distrust (P=0.03), and the decrease in willingness to undergo testing from specialist access was smaller among individuals with high competence distrust (P=0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Several potentially modifiable characteristics of how genetic tests are delivered are associated with willingness to undergo testing. The effect of 2 of these characteristics vary according to the level of health care system distrust, suggesting that policy decisions about delivery of genetic testing may influence differences in uptake across patient subgroups defined by levels of distrust rather than by race

Affect (linguistics) · Distrust · Economics · Environmental health · Family medicine · Genetic testing · Health care · Population · Random digit dialing · Test (biology) · Willingness to pay · BRCA gene mutations in cancer · Ethics in Clinical Research · Global Cancer Incidence and Screening · Medicine · Psychology · Gerontology

  • Racial minority group interest in direct-to-consumer genetic testing

    Open Access•Latrice Landry, Daiva E Nielsen et al.•Journal of Community Genetics•2017

  • Genetic Testing for Cancer Risk

    Open Access•Azimatun Noor Aizuddin, Abdul Rahman Ramdzan et al.•International Journal of…•2021

  • Health care system distrust in Germany

    Open Access•Jens Klein, Anna Christin Makowski et al.•Health Policy•2026

  • Świadomość, możliwości i bariery w poradnictwie genetycznym w kierunku mutacji BRCA oferowanym Afroamerykankom i Latynoskom

    Open Access•Sylwia Michałowska•Kultura-Społeczeństwo-Edukacja•2022

  • Informed consent for polygenic risk score test in type 2 diabetes

    Open Access•Elisa Airikkala, Marja Kaunonen et al.•Research Ethics•2026

  • How do you measure trust in the health system? A systematic review of the literature

    Open Access•Sachiko Ozawa, Pooja Sripad•Social Science & Medicine•2013

  • Conjoint Analysis in Marketing

    Open Access•Paul E Green, V Srinivasan•Journal of Marketing•1990

  • The Path to Personalized Medicine

    Margaret A Hamburg, Margaret Hamburg et al.•New England Journal of Medicine•2010

  • Racial Differences in Trust in Health Care Providers

    Chanita Hughes Halbert, Katrina Armstrong et al.•A.M.A. Archives of Internal…•2006

  • Using conjoint analysis to elicit preferences for health care

    Open Access•Mandy Ryan•BMJ•2000

  • Differences in the Patterns of Health Care System Distrust Between Blacks and Whites

    Open Access•Katrina Armstrong, Suzanne McMurphy et al.•Journal of General Internal…•2008

  • Ashkenazi Jews and Breast Cancer

    Sherry I Brandt-Rauf, Victoria H Raveis et al.•American Journal of Public Health•2006

  • Racial/Ethnic Differences in Physician Distrust in the United States

    Katrina Armstrong, Karima L Ravenell et al.•American Journal of Public Health•2007

Unique citing works6
Citations per year0,46
Citation span2013 - 2026 (14)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 6
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae