Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Quality Varies Across Health Insurance Marketplace Pricing Regions

Bibliographic Data

ID9101729
AuthorsCatherine H MacLean (0000-0003-2581-189X, University of California, Los Angeles, corresponding author), Eric Marnoch (Anthem (United States)), Zhao Sun (0000-0003-0763-7963, Anthem (United States)), Jennifer Curtis (0000-0001-5584-0099, Anthem (United States)), Jeff Burmeister (Anthem (United States)), Emmanuel A Anum, Michael Belman, Michael J Belman (Anthem (United States)), Samuel R Nussbaum (Anthem (United States))
Year2015
Volume53
Issue7
Pages607-618
Publication date2015-07-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueMedical Care (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0025-7079 • E-ISSN: 1537-1948
PublisherOvid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1097/mlr.0000000000000367
PMID26067884
OpenAlexW2411160013
LanguageEN
References cited9

BACKGROUND: Although consumers purchasing health plans in the new Health Insurance Marketplace will be provided information on the cost and quality of participating health plans, it is unclear whether the state-wide plan quality averages that will be reported will accurately represent quality at the pricing region level where care will be received. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate whether currently reported state-wide health plan quality scores accurately represent quality within pricing regions established for the Health Insurance Marketplace. RESEARCH DESIGN: Observational, historical cohort study using health plan administrative and pharmacy data. SUBJECTS: A total of 5.2 million members enrolled in the preferred provider organization health plans of 1 large commercial California insurer in 2012. MEASURES: State-wide and pricing region performance on each of the 17 Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set (HEDIS) measures. RESULTS: Across the 17 measures assessed in each of the 19 pricing regions, scores were statistically different (P<0.05) than the overall plan rate for 176 (54%). Variations in scores across regions were observed for each measure ranging from 6.4-percentage points for engagement in treatment for people with dependence of alcohol or other drugs to 47.2-percentage points for appropriate testing for pharyngitis among children. CONCLUSIONS: Quality scores in California vary greatly across geographic regions. Statewide averages may misrepresent the quality of care that consumers are likely to receive within a geographic area making difficult assessments about the value of the health care

Actuarial science · Business · Economics · Family medicine · Health care · Health plan · Medicare Advantage · Observational study · Purchasing · Quality (philosophy) · Healthcare Policy and Management · Marketing · Medicine · Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare · Pharmacy · Primary Care and Health Outcomes

  • The Oregon Experiment — Effects of Medicaid on Clinical Outcomes

    Katherine Baicker, Sarah Taubman et al.•New England Journal of Medicine•2013

  • The Triple Aim

    Donald M Berwick, Thomas Nolan et al.•Health Affairs•2008

  • Inequality in Quality

    Kevin Fiscella, Peter Franks et al.•JAMA•2000

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae